Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />8. #15-3738 KUHL DESIGN BUILD ON BEHALF OF JOHN AND CYNDY BOWLSBY, <br />1025 SPRING HELL ROAD — VARIANCES (continued) <br />A variance to permit hardcover within 75 feet of the ordinance high water level is also requested. The <br />property is served by a private septic system and must meet a 100 -foot structural setback. <br />The addition to the eastern portion of the home is proposed to be set back 84 feet from the ordinary high <br />water level and lakeward of the 100 -foot setback. The addition/modifications to the western portion of <br />the home are ahead of the average lakeshore setback line but will meet the 100 -foot setback. The in - <br />ground pool is proposed to be 60 feet from the OHWL and lakeward of both the 100 -foot and average <br />lakeshore setbacks and would also consist of hardcover within the 0-75 foot setback. <br />The Planning Commission at its May 18 meeting held a public hearing and reviewed the application <br />including the evidence submitted. There were no public comments made during the public hearing. The <br />adjacent lakeshore neighbors provided written comments in support of the variances. Following the <br />public hearing, the Commission voted 5 to 0 on a split motion as follows: <br />1. Approval of the lake setback and average lakeshore setback variances to allow construction of the <br />eastern addition and the modifications to the portion of the home on the west; and <br />2. Denial of the lake setback, average setback, and hardcover variances relating to the pool. <br />Following the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has provided additional supporting <br />documentation and would like the opportunity to speak further about the practical difficulties tonight. <br />Additional hardcover calculations have also been provided for the 0 to 75 -foot zone, which reflect a <br />proposed increase of 760 square feet of hardcover as a result of the pool and pool deck. <br />Planning Staff' has provided a practical difficulties analysis on Pages 4 and 5 of the Planning Commission <br />staff report. Based on this analysis, Staff recommends approval of the variances to allow construction of <br />the eastern addition and the modifications to the portion of the home on the west. Staff recommends <br />denial of setback and hardcover variances relating to the pool. <br />Staff finds that the location of the existing home currently encroaches into the 100 -foot setback which <br />makes it difficult to make modifications or additions to the lake side of the home. The existing home is <br />one-story. One story additions are proposed, which lessen the massing when viewed from the lake. Due <br />to the elevation change from the lake level to the home level, the two additions to the home may not be <br />visually apparent when viewed from the lake. In addition, it does not appear that the adjacent property <br />owners will be adversely impacted by the two additions to the home. Staff finds that there are special <br />conditions relating to the existing home and property which support granting the requested lake setback <br />and average lakeshore setback variances for the additions. <br />There are special conditions that Staff finds relating to the existing home and property that support <br />granting the requested lake setback and average lakeshore setback variances for the two home additions. <br />However, the proposed pool will be located within the average lakeshore setback, within the 100 -foot <br />structure setback, and almost entirely within the 75 -foot zone where no hardcover or structure is <br />permitted. Staff finds that although the visual impacts of the pool will be minimal from the lake and from <br />adjacent properties, the setback and hardcover variances would serve merely as a convenience to the <br />owners as there are alternative locations where such an amenity could be located on the property. <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />