Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June S, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #f15-3734 CHRISTOPHER BOLLIS, 200/350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH, SKETCH <br />PLAN REVIEW (continued) <br />Gaffron indicated they are 200 feet. Gaffron stated Lot 2 has a wetland off to one side, and by the time <br />the house is placed in conformance with the setbacks as well as septic sites, the building site will be a <br />little tight. Gaffron stated there are few available options, but reducing the lots to 175 feet would not gain <br />much and the septic site would still be up against the back side of the house. <br />McMillan noted with two septic sites in the back yard, the lot would have certain restrictions. <br />Gaffron stated the soil will not be able to be disturbed and no structures will be able to be constructed. <br />Gaffron stated the location of the house is fairly limited and the buyer of the lot will need to understand <br />the limitations. Gaffron stated the topography is a factor in some of the lots. <br />Walsh commented the developer is attempting to get as many 2 -acre lots as possible. <br />McMillan stated she would just like the developer to be aware of the restrictions. <br />Cornick asked if the existing septic system with the proposed lot line going through it is conforming. <br />Gaffron stated the City would not allow a lot line to go over a septic system and that the system would <br />need to be abandoned or relocated. Staff would rather have the applicants move the lot line to avoid an <br />easement. Gaffron stated the City has not allowed an easement over a septic system in the past. <br />Council Member Printup asked how the City notifies future property owners of the restrictions with the <br />septic sites. <br />Gaffron stated there will likely be a homeowners association with this development and that standards <br />would need to be included in covenants, which are filed with the chain of title, but that it is uncertain <br />future homeowners will be aware of those limitations. <br />Christopher Bollis, Applicant, stated as it relates to Lot 2, the proposed septic site is close to the proposed <br />building site on the layout but the septic site could be placed further back and still fit within the lot lines <br />and setbacks. Bollis indicated the building sites were shown as they are simply to reflect that there is <br />room for a house as well as two septic sites. In addition, the septic site for Lots 3 and 7 could also be <br />pushed back. Bollis stated in his view there is a fair amount of flexibility with the location of the septic <br />sites. <br />McMillan asked if any septic testing has been completed at this point. <br />Bollis indicated there has not been any done. <br />Walsh asked what the plans are for the outlot and why that is not being developed at this time. <br />BolIis pointed out his parents' house and stated they would like to continue to live there for the indefinite <br />future. Bollis stated his parents wanted a development that would fit the land the best it could and that the <br />road coming off the cul-de-sac avoids the wooded section. <br />Page 6 of 19 <br />