My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
06-08-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2015 4:06:04 PM
Creation date
6/23/2015 4:05:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 8, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #15-3734 CHRISTOPHER BOLLIS, 2001350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH, SKETCH <br />PLAN REVIEW (continued) <br />The Planning Commission also heard from the owners of 300 Stubbs Bay Road, who indicated that <br />proposed Lot 6 is relatively flat and their existing views would be impacted. The Planning Commission <br />suggested some screening be considered. Further, the Planning Commission discussed whether extension <br />of the private road out to Stubbs Bay Road in the driveway corridor currently serving 300-350 Stubbs Bay <br />Road would be difficult due to low topography and annual flooding. <br />Gaffron pointed out the parcel that is not intended to be developed at this time. Gaffron stated the portion <br />of the property not being subdivided to create building sites should be platted as an outlot unless the <br />applicant intends to make it a building site. If platted as an outlot, it will not be buildable until or unless it <br />is related as a lot. If platted as a lot, it will be subject to septic testing as well as the stormwater and <br />drainage trunk fee and park dedication fee. Gaffron stated the applicants have indicated they do not have <br />intent to develop it at the present time. <br />While the property abuts Stubbs Bay Road North, the proposed building sites are more than 300 feet from <br />that road and proposed to be accessed via an extension of Kintyre Lane. The City's standard for <br />maximum length of a cul-de-sac road is 1,000 feet. Kintyre Lane, as it currently exists, is 900 feet in <br />length and the proposed extension of 650 feet would bring it to 1,550 feet. While there are a number of <br />private roads in the City extending well beyond 1,000 feet, it has been City policy to establish corridors <br />for possible future development of through roads where the ability exists. The City Council should <br />discuss whether a corridor should be dedicated from the proposed road extending west to Stubbs Bay <br />Road. The applicants would prefer not to create that corridor. Gaffron indicated there is some flexibility <br />on what can be done with that area. <br />At the present time the applicant, Staff, and the City Attorney are working with the developer of Kintyre <br />to establish easement agreements and covenants to allow for the extension of Kintyre Lane to serve this <br />proposed development. <br />The Comprehensive Plan shows a future trail being proposed along Stubbs Bay Road connecting from a <br />conceptual trail along the south side of the Burlington Northern Railroad corridor down to the shore of <br />Stubbs Bay. Gaffron stated whether this trail will ever be completed is unknown at this time, but a 10 - <br />foot easement along the west boundary for future trail purposes should be explored. <br />Creation of a new private road is likely to require stormwater ponding and/or other stormwater <br />management measures. Given the general slope to the northeast, it is likely that ponding would occur in <br />the area of one of the four proposed northerly lots. Ponding areas will require the establishment of <br />easements and the ponding areas will not be credited as building area. The anticipated stormwater and <br />drainage trunk fee is approximately $46,800. <br />The wetland delineation report does require MCWD review and approval to confium the indicated <br />boundaries. The MCWD would be involved in establishment of any wetland mitigation requirements if <br />needed and would also be establishing appropriate wetland buffers for the development. The City will <br />require a conservation and flowage easement over each of the wetlands as well as impose standard <br />wetland setback requirements. The development will also be subject to the City's Conservation Design <br />Ordinance. <br />Page 4 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.