Laserfiche WebLink
` � <br /> Orono City Council � <br /> Committee of the Whole <br /> January 26, 2010,6:30 p.m. <br /> Orono City Council Chambers <br /> o Option B <br /> - 42 townhomes with green space north of the fire station, no secondary access, and a <br /> separate building for the commons/community space. <br /> o Option C <br /> - 42 apartments in a 2-story building, more of a traditional parking lot, green space north of <br /> the fire station, and community space inside the building. More trees would be saved with <br /> this design. <br /> o Price points are the same regardless of configuration of the buildings. <br /> o Samples of projects in Blaine and Delano were presented. <br /> o Handicap accessibility could be accomplished by designing some units with a bedroom on the <br /> first level. <br /> o This project is not subsidized housing. Workforce housing requires a certain level of income <br /> usually at 50-60%of the median income—approximately$33,000-$40,000. <br /> o The project will maintain a connection to the park which is actually in Long Lake. <br /> o McMillan asked if there is an advantage to having the commons area separate from the main <br /> buildings. Higgins commented that while designs have been done both ways, it is preferable to <br /> have the commons area (Advantage Service Center)closer to the units to maximize its use. <br /> o Bremer preferred Option B, noting the view along the road is an important consideration. <br /> Murphy agreed,stating that the apartment building design would be least preferable. White <br /> also preferred Option B commenting that this design preserves viewsheds,tucks against the <br /> park and includes natural barriers. <br /> o McMillan questioned the parking needs of the fire department, noting that the fire department <br /> should be comfortable with the parameters of the design. The fire department conducts <br /> activities such as the pancake breakfast or emergency operations that may rely on overflow <br /> parking. <br /> o Bremer suggested a combination of Options A& B could result in a commons building closer to <br /> the main buildings. Murphy added that he would prefer to avoid an additional access. <br /> o White recommended that the Met Council be encouraged to look at public transportation <br /> nearer to the site. <br /> o Murphy asked what the incentive would be for Met Council to contribute $350,000. Higgins <br /> responded that this project could be a model for similar developments. <br /> • Gaffron added the following comments: <br /> o The developer will need to work on stormwater management. There may be room for a <br /> stormwater pond in the southeast corner. The east end of the property already has a drainage <br /> easement which may impact development. The open space to the north of the fire station is <br /> the highest spot on the site and it would be difficult to direct drainage to that area if needed. <br /> o Ron Miller is concerned about the impact to his property if the city lowered the purchase price <br /> of its property. Miller would like some sort of assessment of his property interests at full value <br /> as he doesn't want his value affected by the city's selling price. Miller is a�so concerned with <br /> higher density in the area. <br /> o Local SAC and WAC charges will need to be paid upfront. The city spent extra money on sewer <br /> capacity when the fire station was built to serve additional properties. The city may want to try <br /> to recover some of these costs. <br /> o This project is quite intense for what is normally seen in Orono with many details to address. <br /> o The city benefits by meeting some housing goals with 3.5 acres developed with 42 units. <br /> o Proximity of parking directly east of fire station parking may impact homes closest to the fire <br /> station. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />