Laserfiche WebLink
Christine Mattson <br /> To: cjohnson@lawngevity.net <br /> Subject: RE: 4025 Watertown Road <br /> Hi Charlie, <br /> Let me know if you have further questions. <br /> Christine- <br /> From: cjohnson@lawngevity.net [mailto:cjohnson@lawngevity.net] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:03 PM <br /> To: Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: Re: 4025 Watertown Road <br /> Christine, <br /> Thanks for the helpful information. I have a couple more questions regarding accessory buildings: <br /> The building code says any accessory building must be built behind residence. This property in particular has <br /> the house on the far back of the lot. What actions need to be taken to build in front of the property? I was <br /> thinking in the wooded area before the front lawn, well hidden. <br /> A variance would be needed showing hardship of why the accessory structure couldn't be placed in a <br /> conforming location. <br /> If you apply for conditional use permit for home occupation, who gets notified besides the immediate neighbors <br /> and how long does the process take from application to completion? <br /> I guess I need to know more about what type of business you are thinking of running. I have researched your <br /> email address...Lawngevity. Lawn care businesses are considered "Contractor Shops" and are a prohibited <br /> use in Orono (refer to the Home Occupation information I provided earlier- (e) Prohibited Home Occupations <br /> #7). <br /> If your business is a permitted use, you can submit an application. Neighbors within 350' of the property are <br /> notified as well as a legal notice is published in the SunSailor. Home occupations public hearings are held at <br /> council meetings. Applications received will be heard three weeks after their submission. <br /> The code allows 6,000 sf of building for a 13 acre site, but must be built as 2 separate buildings. What action <br /> needs to be taken to build 1, 5,000 sf building? <br /> A variance would be needed showing hardship of why an accessory structure larger than the allowed 3,000 sq <br /> wouldn't be sufficient. It is generally staff opinion that there is no hardship for a larger building. <br /> Thanks so much for your help, I look forward to hearing from you on this matter. Have a great weekend. <br /> Charlie Johnson <br /> --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Christine Mattson <CMattsont'agLorono.mmus>wrote: <br /> From: Christine Mattson<CMattsonkci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: 4025 Watertown Road <br /> To: "'cjohnson@lawngevity.net"' <cjohnson ,lawngevity.net> <br /> I <br />