My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
11-18-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2019 10:25:24 AM
Creation date
11/19/2019 9:44:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
521
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Letter View <br /> PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM <br /> LA19-000090 <br /> 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br /> the Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: The property owner proposes to us the property in a reasonable manner and is simply looking to <br /> improve and strengthen the existing screened porch / deck structure without changing the existing footprint <br /> that exists today. <br /> 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br /> landowner. <br /> Response: The screened porch / deck structure already exists. The homeowner is not looking to change the <br /> footprint of the structure, only increase the height of the structure to allow the existing deck to be screened <br /> in. <br /> 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> Response: The requested average lakeshore setback variance to improve and strengthen the existing <br /> screened porch / deck structure will not adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent <br /> property owners. <br /> 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for <br /> the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br /> solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in <br /> Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. <br /> Response: This condition is not applicable <br /> 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use <br /> that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land <br /> is located. <br /> Response: This condition is not applicable <br /> 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as <br /> a two-family dwelling. <br /> Response: This condition is not applicable. <br /> 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining property. <br /> Response: This condition is not applicable. <br /> 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said <br /> land is located. <br /> Response: The majority of the homes both to the north and south of the property have very similar <br /> proximity to the lake and are consistently in line with each other. <br /> Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdfjl 1/15/2019 8:07:33 AM] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.