Laserfiche WebLink
Joint Use Dock - Pirates Cove <br />May 7, 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />Section 82-255, the Lot Standards section of the Orono Subdivision Ordinance, prohibits the <br />granting of easements for lake access, and was first adopted in 1984. It reads as follows: <br />Sec. 82-255. Lakeshore lots. <br />The granting of easements which purport to grant access to the lake to any person for any <br />uses, including but not limited to docking, mooring, swimming and launching of boats, is <br />prohibited and shall be deemed a violation of this chapter and subject to all of the penalties <br />and proceedings as set forth in this chapter. (Code 1984, § 11.31(4)) <br />Analysis of Joint Use Request <br />Preliminary discussions between staff and LMCD indicate that with the shoreline of Lots 6 and 7 <br />totaling approximately 344 feet when measured in a straight line, a total of 6 boats would <br />potentially be allowed at the LMCD and City standard of 1 boat per 50 feet of shoreline. In <br />order for each of the four non -riparian lots to have a slip, the two riparian lots would each be <br />limited to one slip. We will need written confirmation that this situation is acceptable to the two <br />riparian owners. <br />The 1967 easement extended 20 feet either side of the lot line between Lots 6 and 7. If the 1971 <br />easement is determined to have superseded the 1967 easement, then the shoreline length devoted <br />to the easement totals 30 feet. Based on the survey provided, LMCD has indicated a side setback <br />variance to the defined "authorized dock use area" is likely to be required. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />I. The proposed joint use dock appears to fall under the definition of "joint use" in that it <br />appears to be an association of (more than 2) nonriparian landowners within a <br />subdivision adjacent to the lake sharing a dock or dock system providing permanent boat <br />slips for the members. Based on the airphoto record, it is entirely possible that past use <br />of the shared dock system did not rise to the level of obviously needing a joint use <br />license. This site had not been noted by staff as appearing to be a joint use situation <br />during past annual lakeshore inspections by City staff. <br />2. If the owners of riparian Lots 6 and 7 each agree to be limited to one slip, it would be <br />reasonable to allow credit for their entire lakeshore length toward the total of 6 slips <br />serving 6 lots. On the other hand, if either owner does not agree to such a limitation, <br />then the `1 slip per 50 feet' standard of Section 94-38 would not be satisfied. <br />3. It is unknown at this time whether this easement would be considered as an existing site <br />under LMCD rules. The easements granted in 1967 and 1971 would appear to predate <br />the 1984 code and might be considered as creating a legal nonconforming situation. <br />4. If the joint use dock license is approved, it would be reasonable to add a stipulation that <br />each boat stored at the site must be registered to one of the non -riparian lot owners. <br />5. In addition to the 2012 survey (Exhibit D), the applicant has submitted two proposed <br />dock layouts, each containing 4 slips (see Exhibits E). It appears that both layouts would <br />require side setback variances from LMCD codes. Layout `A' extends approximately <br />115' into the lake, likely requiring an LMCD length variance, while layout `B' meets <br />LMCD's 100' length limit. <br />