Laserfiche WebLink
Summary of Background Information Provided to City Council: <br />Crystal Bay Road City Lots <br />The City of Orono owns four lakeshore parcels across from residential properties at 3407, 3415, <br />3435 and 3445 Crystal Bay Road. These parcels were quit -claim deeded to the City in the mid - <br />1930s. They are subject to deeded "bathing and boating" rights dating back to 1911 for as many <br />as 150 residential lots in the Navarre area (including the four opposite lots), only a few of which <br />have exercised that right. Staff regularly receives questions from realtors, sellers or potential <br />buyers asking what this means and whether their off -lake properties have the right to have a <br />dock. The City's position is that they do not, for a variety of reasons - primarily that a dock is an <br />accessory structure not allowed without a principal structure. <br />It is unknown how many of these 150 can actually claim "bathing and boating rights" pursuant to <br />the Marketable Title Act. The City Council in 2006 had the Lots surveyed and authorized the <br />City Attorney to commence a Torrens action, with an expectation that Hennepin County would <br />do the extensive title work needed to determine what properties had formalized and retained their <br />legal interest in the parcels. In 2008 it was learned that the County would not do that title work <br />and that it would cost the City $25-30,000 to have it completed. Council chose not to proceed. <br />An additional factor is that the four privately owned residence lots directly across Crystal Bay <br />Road have in the past had docks extending from the City parcels. The City has never formally <br />advised the owners of three of the four to remove their docks from the City property; the fourth, <br />3445 Crystal Bay Road, was the subject of a principal structure tear-down/rebuild variance a few <br />years ago. That variance approval resolution states that the residence property does not include <br />the lakeshore and does not enjoy riparian rights. The other three continue to have docks. <br />In October 2008 (and again in March 2010 and again in August 2010) Karen Elshazly of 3415 <br />Crystal Bay Road asked for a resolution to this issue because she is having difficulty selling her <br />property without established dock rights. In March 2009, Jon Eiss of 3445 Crystal Bay Road <br />requested that he be allowed to have a dock and was turned down by the Council but the Council <br />did offer to look further into the matter of these lots. See Council minutes of 3-9-09 and 4-14- <br />09. <br />At its April 14, 2009 work session Council was presented with a variety of options to consider <br />for dealing with these lots, including doing nothing; requiring removal of the docks; selling to <br />the opposite landowners; leasing the lots individually or as a group to the four opposite owners; <br />develop the site for rental City dock space; or acquire the nearby properties for park or <br />stormwater management purposes. The Council indicated their preference would be to have staff <br />discuss with the City Attorney the pros and cons of selling the parcels. There was no movement <br />on this issue during the remainder of 2009. <br />In a letter dated March 31, 2010 Karen Elshazly indicated to staff she would be satisfied with an <br />easement granting permanent dock rights rather than full ownership of the lakeshore parcel <br />across from her home. Her follow-up letter of August 23, 2010 suggested that sale of the <br />properties to each opposite homeowner would be the least desirable option unless they can be <br />sold at a nominal price. <br />In reviewing the various hypothetical options prior to the September 2011 Work Session, the <br />City Attorney indicated that granting an easement over City property was not a viable option, <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />