Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, October 21, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Shawn Benson, 1220 Lyman, stated they learned about this seven days ago from an anonymous letter, and <br />that he is wondering what the process is for how this is supposed to unfold and how the neighbors learn <br />about it. <br /> <br />Ressler stated the Planning Commission’s responsibility is to provide feedback to the City Council and <br />that they have the option of either voting for, against, or tabling the application. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff sent out a postcard to properties located within 500 feet of the two subject parcels. <br />That notice has to be sent out between 10 and 20 days before the meeting. Staff did field a number of <br />calls and questions right away, which demonstrates that people received it. If the Planning Commission <br />elects to table the application, direction will be provided to the applicant on how they should proceed, and <br />then it will be heard at the City Council meeting on November 12th. <br /> <br />Benson stated it would be nice to notify everyone on Lyman and Smith because they are all impacted by <br />it and that they might not be dealing with completely accurate information. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. <br /> <br />Ressler stated what is proposed is unclear, which is the difficulty a number of people are having today. <br />Providing equitable access to the trail and addressing safety concerns would be agreeable to the neighbors <br />but that he is not sure how they get there. It is not clear whether that can be done with an alternative <br />access point. <br /> <br />McCutcheon stated he would be in favor of tabling the application. McCutcheon indicated he drove <br />down there this weekend and the road is tight. The neighborhood needs a cul-de-sac. If there is a plan <br />that depicts the cul-de-sac and the trail access, that would be very helpful. Due to the City’s pavement <br />project, the timeline is tight and requires decisions to be made rather quickly. McCutcheon recommended <br />they show the sanitary sewer solution as well on the plan. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked when the road project will be reviewed by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated it will be this winter. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the cul-de-sac will fit on the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated it will not and that the City would like to make it as standard as possible for <br />emergency vehicle access. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated the three concerns he heard related to access, safety, traffic, and turnaround. Thiesse stated <br />he usually is not in favor of vacations, but that a turnaround will be provided with a cul-de-sac. While the <br />owner is going to benefit greatly by this, he will also be giving back so the City will not be losing <br />anything. If a formal plan that meets all the requirements is submitted, he would likely be in support of it. <br /> <br />Gettman stated a decision at this point would be premature and that he would be in favor of tabling it at <br />this point. <br />