Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, October 21, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />not occur for at least five years, and that he hopes this is a good solution and a good time to address this <br />road. <br /> <br />Ressler asked if there is any reason why he would not be agreeable to providing an easement as proposed <br />versus the alternative. <br /> <br />Bonnett stated they are agreeable to that but the property line might move. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff’s issue is not with where the easement is as long as access is protected, but the <br />bigger issue is the creation of a cul-de-sac. The location of an easement for trails has some potential to <br />not match, which is why Staff would like to see it on a plan so it is clearly defined. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Stacy Quinn, 125 Smith Avenue, noted they did write a letter in opposition of this vacation. Quinn <br />indicated she is a Libertarian and she believes in the four-way test. The four-way test is: Is it is the truth, <br />is it fair to all concerned, will it build goodwill and better friendships, and will it be beneficial to all <br />concerned. Being one of the first two homes on Smith Avenue, she has seen maybe two people who have <br />been lost looking for 6 Smith. <br /> <br />Quinn stated they purchased on Smith because they have access to the Luce Line off of Smith, which is a <br />safe way to access the Luce Line. There is no formal plan in place, and she has not been approached by <br />Mr. Bonnett until yesterday when she received an e-mail from him. <br /> <br />Gettman asked whether a cul-de-sac would be an improvement in her mind. <br /> <br />Quinn indicated she would like to see the plans and know what it looks like. Based on what is being said <br />tonight, it is still up in the air as to what it is going to look like as well as the access to the Luce Line. <br />Have heard of lot of maybe’s but nothing in concrete. <br />Ressler asked if she is fundamentally okay with the cul-de-sac but opposed to relocation of the access <br />point. <br /> <br />Quinn indicated that is correct. <br /> <br />Lisa Benson, 1220 Lyman, stated she and her husband agree this is a wonderful neighborhood and that <br />they also have a concern about the safety of the Bonnett children, their own two children, and all of the <br />children living in the neighborhood. Like the Bonnetts, they agree that public access to the Luce Line at <br />the end of Smith Avenue should be preserved. <br /> <br />While she can appreciate TJ’s comments, she does not see evidence that thought was given to other <br />children in the neighborhood and that it is not clear to her how the plan improves the safety of other <br />children. Benson stated she is not convinced that the idea of collective community safety has been <br />considered here and that it can be hard to appreciate how safe our community is. The real fear is distrust <br />and discord between neighbors. The reason there is distrust at the moment is because the residents heard <br />about the proposed changes from a letter. Benson stated they have a strong desire to maintain <br />relationships with our neighbors. <br />