My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 1:10:15 PM
Creation date
11/4/2019 12:58:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#LA19-000071 <br />16 Sept 2019 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: <br />Stormwater <br />Overlay <br />District Tier <br />Total Area <br />in Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover <br />Tier 1 165,138 s.f. 41,284 s.f. <br />(25 %) <br />22,223 s.f. <br />(13.4%) <br />10,766 s.f. <br />w/in 75’ <br />22,498 s.f. <br />(13.6%) <br />10,766 s.f. <br />w/in 75’ <br />The hardcover calculations have been adjusted to account for the exclusion of all of the <br />retaining walls as is permitted. <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) <br />The subject property is a peninsula connected to 2165 North Shore Drive by a 6 foot wide strip <br />of land. This property is situated across the bay and is the only adjacent property for <br />determining the average lakeshore setback. The home at 2165 North Shore is located <br />approximately 170 feet from the OHWL; according to the City Code improvements must be <br />located equal to or further back from the lake than the 2165 North Shore Drive home. The <br />existing home is situated as close as 46 feet to the OHWL however the additions/improvements <br />are at least 77 feet from the OHWL but within the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />See Exhibit E showing the building area outside the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed location of the home additions do not block lake views of the adjacent <br />property owners, and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The average lakeshore setback <br />variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. <br />The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The variance requests are residential in nature <br />and are reasonable considering the unique nature of the property as a large
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.