My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 1:10:15 PM
Creation date
11/4/2019 12:58:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br />Walsh stated they cannot. If they had come before the Council under this new language, the only <br />difference between the two is they would not require a variance under the new language. <br /> <br />Kelly Hueler stated there needs to be clarity so there are not unreasonable variance requests due to <br />confusion. Hueler stated they do not want to see people who have requested and been granted variances <br />come in again for a variance. <br /> <br />Walsh noted they have already received approval, and if they want to move their house any closer, they <br />would require a variance. <br /> <br />Kelly Hueler commented that is the concern they have. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if it was a situation that was impacted by the change, they could come before the City <br />Council. The City could potentially have some situations like that, and that it is not unlike when the City <br />changed the hardcover rules. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out the overall hardcover would also come into play, because if someone wanted to push <br />their house closer to the lake, that may require a longer driveway. <br /> <br />Crosby noted they also have the 75-foot setback that they will have to comply with. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the change might result in three feet to five feet differences but that there are not going to be <br />huge changes to the line. In addition, the new language will help clarify things. <br /> <br />Greg Hueler noted Staff had said there were 40 variance requests this year. Hueler asked how many of <br />those variances related to this development. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated it was very few. <br /> <br />Kelly Hueler commented there was a lot of confusion on a whole lot of levels on the project next to their <br />house and their concern is about changing city code because of confusion on a project that was <br />immensely confusing for a lot of reasons. <br /> <br />Walsh stated most changes result from applications where the ordinance does not make sense or where an <br />issue has not been raised before. <br /> <br />Greg Hueler asked if the change in the code will decrease the number of variance requests. <br /> <br />Walsh stated it could. <br /> <br />Johnson noted one application dealt with oversized accessory structures where he wanted to add on to an <br />existing building but was prohibited from doing that because he would have exceeded the maximum <br />number of square feet for a single building. That text amendment will be before the City Council at their <br />next meeting. <br /> <br />Walsh commented there are also issues with slope stabilization that come up periodically and how long <br />the process takes and the Council is discussing ways to streamline that process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.