My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
09-23-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
10/30/2019 11:29:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 9, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br />Craig Sky, 2795 Pheasant Road, stated he is the house in the middle in one of the options. As the Council <br />can see, there are a number of different options available and that they have stated they basically <br />understand the challenges with the blue line. As you go to the existing line and the red line, the red line <br />actually becomes more restrictive in his example. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the Council does not want to make any wholesale changes and that they would just like to <br />make an exception when it goes through someone’s house. <br /> <br />Sky stated he appreciates that, and if they want to take this one step further, they should show examples <br />of that and have another discussion about it. If the Council took all of these examples and apply their <br />proposed solution to it, everyone could understand it. <br /> <br />Walsh directed Staff to bring some examples back to the next City Council meeting highlighting the <br />proposed change by the Council. At that time the Council will just be voting on this one specific tweak to <br />the code. <br /> <br />Crosby indicated he is in support of that. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he would like to leave it as is and that the Council can review any issues on a case-by-case <br />basis. <br /> <br />Crosby stated the proposed language would help clarify it. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the goal is to make government as simple as possible and that Staff can bring it back in two <br />weeks with that specific language. <br /> <br />17. CITY LAND SALE PROCEDURE <br /> <br />Barnhart noted back in May of this year the City Council received a request from a party regarding the <br />purchase of a city lot off of Willow Road. In addition, Council members have been approached regarding <br />the four city lots on Crystal Bay Road. Those reasons, as well as recent requests to vacate rights-of-way, <br />prompted the Council to consider a policy to respond to these requests. <br /> <br />In June, the Council directed Staff to prepare a policy, which was reviewed on August 26. Following <br />discussion, the Council found that a policy was not necessary and directed Staff to prepare a procedure. It <br />requires an interested party to provide a written proposal, a narrative, and, if part of a development, a <br />sketch. <br /> <br />Johnson stated they should put language in there saying the sale request should be made in writing and <br />provided to Staff. Johnson noted this is just a process to get it to the City Council and that they could <br />change it from administrator to Staff. He would further recommend the person requesting the purchase <br />provide details of the intended use and the proposed purchase parameters in their written request. <br />Johnson suggested deleting B and replacing it with the language he suggested. Item C would be changed <br />to Staff rather than Administrator. In addition, Item E needs to be revised to read better. <br /> <br />Walsh stated E should perhaps say selling or buying. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.