Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 9, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />Seals stated the LMCD has a whole board that could do outreach for free and that they are simply <br />marketing themselves to the residents using their tax dollars. <br /> <br />Rief reported he met with James Whisker this morning at the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and <br />that he has been there about 18 months now. They had a good discussion about what Orono is doing in <br />the watershed and what they are doing. In October the Watershed District will be approaching the various <br />cities looking for input and then doing some revisions to their processes. The Watershed District would <br />like to do it more incrementally rather than drastic changes. <br /> <br />Walsh noted Staff deals with them regularly and that he would like to see what Staff’s thoughts are on <br />how things can be improved. <br /> <br />Rief stated one item that was discussed was a development from preliminary plat to final plat and the <br />amount of time it takes. The Watershed District will be working on trying to streamline the process more. <br /> <br />Rief reported he received an email last week Thursday regarding the school and the construction related <br />to the water line. A response has not been sent at this time. The contractor missed a connection on the <br />fire connection for the building to the north. That connection was then rerouted through the school <br />property. The City notified the school of the start date and the contractor started the project. During <br />construction of that project, the contractor cut electrical and fiber lines that were owned by the school. <br />The School District is now asking the contractor pay for that repair work. Staff does not feel the <br />contractor should pay for it. The City has already offered to pay $37,000 for the added water connection. <br /> <br />Johnson asked how the City could not be responsible for that. <br /> <br />Rief stated the contractor did the One Call and it was not marked. <br /> <br />Seals asked if the City did their due diligence that would typically be done to ensure they were aware of <br />where all the lines were. <br /> <br />Edwards stated this is a unique situation. The call for locates goes out to all the private and public <br />utilities. Those locates are only done in pubic corridors, such as in rights-of-ways and easements by the <br />utilities that own that infrastructure. If there are private utilities buried in a public or private area, that <br />responsibility lies with that private property owner, and in this case that would be the school. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the school knew they were there. <br /> <br />Edwards stated they indicated they did not know the electrical lines were there but that they knew about <br />the fiber optic line. The School District has indicated the City did not specifically ask them to identify it. <br />The question is whether there is a responsibility for the City to say mark your stuff other than showing <br />them the map and giving them the dates. <br /> <br />Johnson stated if the contractor had done it right the first time, this would not have been an issue. <br /> <br />Edwards stated as it relates to the water main project, the service line was not shown on any of the plans <br />and no one noticed it previously. That service was put in in the early 1990s when the building was <br />converted from a church to a school facility. When that service was put in, it was likely directionally <br />bored under the street. The method that was used in replacing the water main is the existing one was