Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. ________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality <br />Overlay District. <br /> <br />5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: <br />a. Creek Setback <br /> <br />6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and <br />air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br />area. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />1. “The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot <br />includes difficulties in its area and depth. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to expand <br />the structure on a nonconforming lot of record is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the additions to the <br />home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the tributary <br />setback, appears to be reasonable as the project will not change the current <br />setbacks and will not increase hardcover. The property’s reduced size and depth <br />and 75’ creek setback creates difficulties. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the <br />uniquely small size and depth, and required setbacks are unique. and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Few of other <br />properties in the neighborhood have similar setback challenges, the subject <br />property will not be out of character with the neighborhood. <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in <br />Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This <br />condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono <br />City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This