My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
09-09-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 11:23:44 AM
Creation date
10/30/2019 11:09:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 19, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />2. LA19-000054 JOHN KRAEMER & SONS ON BEHALF OF OCBR 1, 855 OLD <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH, 6:49 P.M. – 6:58 P.M. <br /> <br />Anthon Ellis, Charlie & Company Design, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated a new home is being built on the property and will involve the export of approximately <br />3,200 cubic yards of material from the site to accommodate the proposed home. As a result, an interim <br />use permit is required. The applicant proposes to export the material from the site out of the City. The <br />proposed haul route is north on Old Crystal Bay Road South to County Road 112 and then west on <br />County Road 112 to Maple Plain. <br /> <br />Staff finds the proposed plan conforms to the standards of the IUP review. The material removal activity <br />will be tied to the building permit for the new residence. The City Engineer will review the revised <br />grading plan for conformance. <br /> <br />No public comments have been received. The Little Orchard homeowners’ association has approved the <br />property owner’s request to connect a driveway from the subject property to Little Orchard Way. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the IUP to export approximately 3,200 cubic yards of material in <br />accordance with the City Engineer’s requirements associated with the overall building permit. <br /> <br />Gettman noted at the July Planning Commission meeting there was a resident that was complaining about <br />the truck noise and asked whether there is any additional guidance that can be communicated to the <br />hauler. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the contractors vary in how they handle the hauling, but it has been her experience that this <br />contractor is very proactive in that respect. As part of the IUP request, the neighbors are notified and a <br />public hearing is held. <br /> <br />Gettman asked whether the City is contemplating requiring anything in addition to what is normally <br />required. <br /> <br />Curtis stated in her view it is not necessary in this situation and that this is a totally different situation <br />from the project on Walter’s Port. <br /> <br />Ressler noted the majority of the roads are county roads. <br /> <br />Anthon Ellis, Charlie & Company Design, stated he has nothing to add to Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. <br />Gettman stated he has no issues with the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.