Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,October 14,2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> -49 percent total site hardcover where 25 percent is allowed; <br /> -30 percent building/structural coverage where 20 percent is the maximum allowed; <br /> -Rear yard setback; <br /> -Front(street)setback; and <br /> -Side yard setback. <br /> An interim use permit for export of approximately 1,120 cubic yards of material to be hauled from the <br /> property within 75-foot setback and off site is also being requested. <br /> At the September Planning Commission meeting, following a public hearing and discussion,they voted <br /> 4-2 on a motion to deny the requested variances. There was considerable discussion regarding the <br /> proposed structural coverage and the adjusted lot area used to calculate structural coverage between the <br /> applicant and the Planning Commission. In situations like this one where the traveled roadway does not <br /> exist in a dedicated easement,the actual paved width is removed from the lot area for calculation <br /> purposes. The total lot area of this property is 14,459 square feet;however,the adjusted area is <br /> determined to be 11,100 square feet. <br /> Staff does find practical difficulties inherent to the size and shape of the property in addition to the <br /> location of the roadway and lake to justify some level of variances for redevelopment. However,the <br /> applicant is proposing redevelopment on this property at a scale which is unsupported by practical <br /> difficulties and is far beyond what is reasonable for the property and neighborhood to support. <br /> Staff recognizes that this lot requires certain variances to support development and redevelopment. Staff <br /> does not support the structural coverage or hardcover variances because it appears the requests are borne <br /> out of convenience rather than hardship. Staff recommends the structural coverage be reduced to 20 <br /> percent. <br /> Staff recommends denial of the application as proposed. <br /> John Quinlivan, Gordon James Construction,noted there are currently 28 properties on Crystal Bay Road, <br /> with 24 considered lakeshore. Of the 24 properties with lakeshore,this property is the widest property at <br /> 150 feet. There are approximately 11 lots that are 50 feet or less width,four lots have 60 feet or less in <br /> width,five have 90 feet or less in width,and three lots are over 100 feet in width. This property is the <br /> widest of those properties but is also the second shallowest property,which presents a number of <br /> challenges and practical difficulties. A practical difficulty has to be a reasonable manner not created by <br /> the owner and fits the character of the neighborhood. <br /> A number of the lots to the west have front-load garages due to the width of the lot. There are five lots <br /> that are wider that have side-loading garages. Several properties to the east have variances for a garage <br /> tucked in the back. A side-loading garage was designed for several different reasons. Number one,it <br /> offers a better appearance. Number two,Crystal Bay Road is narrow, and it was felt it would be better <br /> not to back out into the street. The setbacks are greater than three times what was required. There is also <br /> very limited parking on Crystal Bay Road and the side-loading garage would allow for guest parking. <br /> As it relates to hardcover,they are proposing to capture nearly 100 percent of the runoff through cisterns <br /> that would capture as much water as possible. The driveway and other exterior hardcover will use <br /> pervious pavers and the gutters will direct water to the buried cisterns. The homeowners are very <br /> Page 10 of 16 <br />