Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, September 9,2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Seals stated the LMCD has a whole board that could do outreach for free and that they are simply <br /> marketing themselves to the residents using their tax dollars. <br /> Rief reported he met with James Whisker this morning at the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and <br /> that he has been there about 18 months now. They had a good discussion about what Orono is doing in <br /> the watershed and what they are doing. In October the Watershed District will be approaching the various <br /> cities looking for input and then doing some revisions to their processes. The Watershed District would <br /> like to do it more incrementally rather than drastic changes. <br /> Walsh noted Staff deals with them regularly and that he would like to see what Staff's thoughts are on <br /> how things can be improved. <br /> Rief stated one item that was discussed was a development from preliminary plat to final plat and the <br /> amount of time it takes. The Watershed District will be working on trying to streamline the process more. <br /> Rief reported he received an email last week Thursday regarding the school and the construction related <br /> to the water line. A response has not been sent at this time. The contractor missed a connection on the <br /> fire connection for the building to the north. That connection was then rerouted through the school <br /> property. The City notified the school of the start date and the contractor started the project. During <br /> construction of that project,the contractor cut electrical and fiber lines that were owned by the school. <br /> The School District is now asking the contractor pay for that repair work. Staff does not feel the <br /> contractor should pay for it. The City has already offered to pay$37,000 for the added water connection. <br /> Johnson asked how the City could not be responsible for that. <br /> Rief stated the contractor did the One Call and it was not marked. <br /> Seals asked if the City did their due diligence that would typically be done to ensure they were aware of <br /> where all the lines were. <br /> Edwards stated this is a unique situation. The call for locates goes out to all the private and public <br /> utilities. Those locates are only done in pubic corridors, such as in rights-of-ways and easements by the <br /> utilities that own that infrastructure. If there are private utilities buried in a public or private area,that <br /> responsibility lies with that private property owner, and in this case that would be the school. <br /> Crosby asked if the school knew they were there. <br /> Edwards stated they indicated they did not know the electrical lines were there but that they knew about <br /> the fiber optic line. The School District has indicated the City did not specifically ask them to identify it. <br /> The question is whether there is a responsibility for the City to say mark your stuff other than showing <br /> them the map and giving them the dates. <br /> Johnson stated if the contractor had done it right the first time,this would not have been an issue. <br /> Edwards stated as it relates to the water main project,the service line was not shown on any of the plans <br /> and no one noticed it previously. That service was put in in the early 1990s when the building was <br /> converted from a church to a school facility. When that service was put in, it was likely directionally <br /> bored under the street. The method that was used in replacing the water main is the existing one was <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br />