My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
permit record
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sussex Road
>
3077 Sussex Road (NO PID)
>
permit record
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2023 7:19:51 AM
Creation date
9/27/2019 1:58:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
ProcessedPID
True
Tags
No PIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing <br /> August 22, 1989 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> General Comments - <br /> Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and <br /> alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the primary and <br /> alternate sites shown are the only possible sites available. On <br /> other lots, it is likely that additional testing could find a <br /> number of potential sites, allowing additional flexibility in <br /> house placement. <br /> In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet <br /> the minimum 20' setback from property lines, and 75' setbacks <br /> from designated wetlands. <br /> On the majority of lots, extreme caution must be taken <br /> during construction of improvements to the property. Road <br /> construction will take place within 50' of tested drainfield <br /> sites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 lots the sites are <br /> relatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a <br /> detention basin. I would recommend that each lot have drainfield <br /> sites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield <br /> sites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield <br /> system. Additionally, when road construction plans are <br /> submitted, I would like to review them to determine where road <br /> cut would have a potential impact on drainfield sites. <br /> Summary - <br /> Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems <br /> and 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and <br /> alternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as <br /> many as 20% of the sites ultimately will have to be re-tested due <br /> to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conflicting <br /> with drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential <br /> drainfield sites, others provide a degree of flexibility in house <br /> placement. <br /> Given the above facts, concerns, and constraints, I would <br /> recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying <br /> this memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showing <br /> potential house locations and locations of both primary and <br /> alternate drainfield sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.