Laserfiche WebLink
wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the current <br /> version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all subsequent <br /> versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this Regional Supplement <br /> takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications in the Midwest Region." <br /> National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2a), Hennepin County Wetland Inventory (HCWI) <br /> maps (Figure 2b), 2014 DNR NWI Update maps (Figure 2c), Web Soil Survey of Hennepin County <br /> map (Figure 3), Minnesota Public Waters Inventory maps (Figure 4), and 2012 aerial photographs were <br /> reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating evidence of <br /> wetland conditions were examined in greater detail during the field survey. Vegetation, soils and <br /> hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual) and used to characterize wetland types and <br /> determine wetland boundaries. Sample transects were established in representative wetland-to-upland <br /> transition zones in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Transects <br /> consist of a representative upland sample point and representative wetland sample point. Information <br /> obtained at the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in the Technical Documents <br /> section. <br /> Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The wetland <br /> boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; areas below the <br /> staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in one or more <br /> of these criteria. Wetlands were classified in accordance with methods described by Cowardin et al. <br /> (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification systems are also given. The indicator <br /> status of plants, as described in the Technical Documents section, was determined using the National <br /> Wetland Plant List(Lichvar, et al. 2014. http://wetland plants.usace.arnzy.miln. <br /> RESULTS <br /> The National Wetland Inventory does not indicate any wetlands in the survey area (Figure 2a). The <br /> HCWI indicates the presence of one probable wetland in the survey area (Figure 2b) on the far western <br /> end of the parcel. The DNR NWI update in 2014, like the original NWI also does not indicate any <br /> wetlands in the survey area(Figure 2c). <br /> The Web Soil Survey of Hennepin County (Figure 3) identifies four soil map units present on the <br /> subject property. They are as follows: Hamel-Glencoe, depressional, complex; Angus loam, morainic; <br /> Shorewood silty clay loam; and Lester loam, morainic, eroded. The Hamel-Glencoe soil is <br /> predominantly hydric while the remaining types are predominantly nonhydric. Soil series descriptions <br /> are provided in the Technical Documents section. <br /> The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State Protected Waters Map (Public Waters <br /> Inventory) indicates no public waters within the study area(Figure 4). <br /> Site Visit <br /> SER ecologists examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria during <br /> the site visit. Two area meeting the jurisdictional criteria of a wetland were flagged on 10/06/14 and <br /> boundaries were determined and delineated. Field data was collected on 10/09/14. The approximate <br /> wetland boundaries are outlined in yellow (Figures 5 and 6). Additionally one other area, on the west <br /> side of the property,was examined for wetland indicators. <br /> Svoboda Ecological Resources 185 Old Crystal Bay Road <br /> 2014-030-03 2 Lillian Stubbs <br />