Laserfiche WebLink
• Dunn& McCuskey S&W Charges Analysis <br /> April 13,2009 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Dunn & McCuskey - Water Connection Fee Formula: <br /> 1) Water Main Improvements: $38,906 $38,906 <br /> 2) 1/2 of Base maintenance roadway costs: <br /> $ 2,000 Mobilization <br /> 14,000 common excavation <br /> 16,800 Class IV and V Base <br /> 2,250 fabric <br /> $35,050 35,050 <br /> 3) Restoration $10,000 10,000 <br /> $83,956 <br /> Water Connection Fee = $83,956 / 10 base dwelling units = $8,396 / unit <br /> (Base units=7 in subdiv. Plus i McCuskey and 2 Dunn) <br /> Note: It is unclear whether the old Long Lake S&W fees (paid for the seven Creekside lots <br /> in 2005) apply, or some yet-to-be-agreed-upon new fees apply per the "Sewer and Water <br /> Hook-up and Connection Charge" established in the (still pending) "Municipal Utility <br /> Service Agreement by and between the Cities of Long Lake and Orono". Those fees are <br /> $1,600 per unit for each SAC-equivalent sewer connection and $1,500 for each water <br /> connection (and will there also be "tap fees" of$1100 for water and $1200 for sewer as there <br /> �aa�re in 2005?). Orono would collect these at the time of connection permit issuance along <br /> with the standard Met Council SAC charge for sewer connection. The Long Lake connection <br /> fees collected by Orono will be a pass-through to Long Lake. The MCES SAC charge will <br /> continue to be a pass-through to Met Council. <br /> To summarize, the connection charges for each of the Dunn & McCuskey properties for 2009 <br /> would be: <br /> Sewer: Water. <br /> $ 9,421 Orono Sewer Connection Charge $ 8,396 Orono Water Connection Charge <br /> 1,600 L. L. Sewer Conn. Charge 1,500 L. L. Water Conn. Charge <br /> 2,000 MCES SAC (2009) $ 9,896 (???Plus $1100 LL Hookup?) <br /> $ 13,021 (???Plus $1200 LL Hookup?) <br /> (Due with application for sewer or water connection permit) <br /> Questions for Discussion <br /> 1. What connection fees will Long Lake will be charging for these connections? Given <br /> the lack of a joint S&W Agreement with Long Lake after 5 years of negotiations, <br /> what is the best way to approach this without causing an undesirable outcome? <br /> 2. Does Council concur with staff regarding the method being used to determine a fair <br /> connection charge, or the applicability of the charge in this or similar situations? <br /> 3. What are the expectations of Dunn regarding these fees? <br />