Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 12, 2019 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />neighboring lot to the north. That lot is flag shaped with the buildable portion set much further back. <br />Due to this configuration, the subject lot is not buildable without an average lakeshore setback variance. <br />The current home is nonconforming due to this extreme setback and hardcover. The applicants are <br />proposing to build a new home with more massing forward of the average lakeshore setback compared to <br />what is there today. The hardcover will decrease from the current level of 30.5 percent to 29.5 percent <br />with the proposed plan but will remain over the 25 percent maximum. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed and discussed the request. The Commission voted 5-1 to <br />recommend approval of the requested variances. <br />Staff recommends approval, subject to the City Engineer's comments, for the lot area, lot width, and <br />hardcover variances. Staff recommends approval of the requested average lakeshore setback. <br />Johnson requested the GIS be displayed. <br />Oakden displayed an aerial of the area and pointed out the neighboring home and the lot that was <br />subdivided. That subdivision resulted in a principal structure on the property and the extreme average <br />lakeshore setback. <br />Crosby asked how far ahead of the current home they will be going. <br />Oakden stated to her knowledge it is around 30 feet. Oakden noted the orange is the footprint of the <br />proposed home. There will be a screen porch that will be approximately 30 by 15 feet, which is forward <br />of the existing patio. <br />Walsh asked where the 75 -foot setback is. <br />Oakden stated it is pretty far forward. <br />Walsh asked if the setbacks are five feet and eight feet. <br />Oakden indicated the 5 -foot is the window well and that there are 8 -foot setbacks on the setback. They <br />are required to meet a 7.8 -foot setback. On the other side there is 12 feet. <br />Walsh commented it is really the average lakeshore setback that is the issue, which will not change the <br />view for the adjoining property, and that the hardcover is being reduced slightly. <br />Crosby asked where the average lakeshore setback line is to the neighboring home. <br />Oakden pointed out the approximate location of the line. The applicants have tried to align the proposed <br />house with the other residences in the area. The red line on the survey is the closest point to the lake, <br />which creates the average Lakeshore setback line. <br />Johnson noted they used two different points of reference, the property to the south, which is not the <br />furthermost point, and the property to the north, which is the furthermost point to the lake. <br />Walsh stated one is 136 feet and the other one is 142 feet. <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />