Laserfiche WebLink
LA19-000048 <br />July 15, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted <br />under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's <br />land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an <br />allowed use in the LR -1C District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and <br />orientation and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for <br />the Owners in redeveloping the property consistent with the homes in their <br />neighborhood. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The property's nonconforming size and the relationship between the <br />existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the <br />owners. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area, lot width, and average <br />lakeshore variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the <br />applicant. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested hardcover, lot area, lot width and average lakeshore setback variances in <br />this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variances for lot width, <br />lot area, and average lakeshore set setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Staff finds due to the nature of the lot and the applied setbacks there are practical difficulties <br />supporting granting the lot area, lot width, hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances <br />for construction of a new home. <br />Engineer Comments <br />The Engineer has reviewed the proposal and recommends the home have gutters and to develop <br />a drainage plan to ensure no runoff is directed to the neighboring properties or roadway. <br />