Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, July 15, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />5. LA19-000051 DALE GUSTAFSON, 1905 CONCORDIA STREET, VARIANCE AND <br />INTERIM USE PERMIT, 7:28 P.M. — 7:56 P.M. <br />Dale Gustafson, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of a lake setback variance and interim use permit to <br />repair a slope failure. During the process of building a new home, foundation work was underway and <br />there were several consecutive rain events. This resulted in the failure of the lower portion of the lake <br />slope on the property. Similar failures have occurred on the property over the years and the previous <br />owners had worked to incrementally repair those failures as they occurred. <br />The applicant is proposing to install a subterranean timber retaining wall grid system to stabilize and <br />repair the slope. Because the walls are not permitted within the lake yard, a 75 -foot lake setback variance <br />is required. The grid layout will create boxes to be filled with soil to recreate the slope. Plantings with <br />deep roots are proposed to be installed on the slope. The applicant's plan has been certified by a <br />professional engineer. <br />Retaining walls are not permitted within the lake yard. However, the hardcover associated with the walls <br />is excluded from the site hardcover totals. Hardcover on the site, with the proposed improvements, will <br />be below 25 percent. <br />No public comments have been received in response to this application. <br />Staff finds practical difficulty in the lake yard slope failure to allow the subterranean retaining wall <br />system to be installed. <br />The retaining wall grid system has been signed by a professional engineer. Planning Staff recommends <br />approval of the variance permitting the subterranean retaining wall grid system to repair and restore the <br />lake side slope conditioned upon implementation of a landscape plan which creates a natural vegetated <br />slope over the walls. The applicant has proposed a landscape plan with three varieties of plants. The City <br />Engineer is requesting some additional certification and more plan details. <br />Ressler asked if the further detail can be provided prior to the City Council meeting. <br />Curtis stated that can be included in the Planning Commission recommendation. The City Engineer <br />would require that as a part of any building permit. <br />Ressler asked if there is a survey that speaks to any grading changes. <br />Curtis stated at the time of the survey, the slope had not yet failed, and that there is a general indication of <br />the area on the survey. Some further detail and clarification is what the City Engineer is looking for as it <br />relates to the grid system and its location to the adjacent property. The survey says existing boulder walls <br />in this area and then it says proposed buried retaining walls and refers to the landscaping details. The <br />City Engineer was unclear as to where the start and stop of the failure was and that the City Engineer has <br />an expectation the applicant will be able to put together the detail he is asking for. <br />McCutcheon asked if there were steps in the area where it failed. <br />