Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, July 15, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />4. LA18-000050 ERIC VOGSTROM, 2710 PENCE LANE, VARIANCES, 7:15 P.M. — 7:28 P.M. <br />Eric Vogstrom, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a lake setback variance for retaining walls associated with a lake <br />access stair. A new home is currently under construction on the property and the owner is proposing to <br />construct set-in grade lake/dock access stairs. The stairs require some minimal retaining walls due to the <br />slope of the lake yard. The walls would begin approximately 13 feet from the ordinary high-water level. <br />The stairs are a permitted lake setback encroachment for this sloped lakeshore lot, but the retaining walls <br />are not. A 75 -foot lake setback variance is required. Hardcover with the proposed improvements would <br />be below 25 percent. <br />Stairs are permitted by City Code. In similar situations, property owners have two choices in installing <br />stairs: above -grade deck -type stairs or in -ground stairs. Above grade deck stairs are often more visually <br />impactful, as the entire structure is above ground. These stairs are often used where protection of the <br />slope is of greater importance than preserving the natural shoreline view. In -ground stairs blend into the <br />shoreline more effectively but often require some slope stabilization. These are often used where the <br />slope is minor and helps to better preserve the natural shoreline. <br />Public comment was received and has been included in the Planning Commission packet. <br />Staff finds practical difficulty in the lake yard slope to allow the minimal retaining walls associated with <br />the set-in grade stair system for lake and dock access. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance permitting the retaining walls to support the stairs <br />conditioned upon implementation of a landscape plan which screens the walls from the lake. The <br />applicant has emailed a photograph of a property with a similar landscape design and that will be put up <br />on the overhead. <br />Bollis asked whether the variance is just for the retaining wall. <br />Curtis indicated it is. The stairs are permitted but the walls are not. The applicant could install an above- <br />ground staircase. The walls will be generally screened and will help soften that look. <br />Eric Vogstrom, Applicant, stated he had nothing to add to Staff's report. <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. <br />Greg Hueler, 2710 Pence Lane, stated he is here to support the application, but the issue he has is that the <br />subdivision was supposed to have guidelines for not using the driveway. The Dunkleys are still using the <br />driveway, which was a specific prohibition under the plat approval. <br />Hueler commented he wants the Planning Commission to understand that a lot of people are watching this <br />to see if they will be approving a variance on a property that is not in compliance with what has been <br />approved. Hueler stated due to the lack of consequences of ignoring the direction of the City and the <br />Mayor, he is not sure how the Planning Commission can deal with it. If it is approved, other citizens will <br />expect the same treatment and that they should expect a number of neighbors expecting the same <br />nonchalant concern for the shoreline and the hillside. <br />