Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 10, 2019 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Seals stated the challenge is that everyone views it from a different perspective and that Orono is very <br />much on an island when it comes to their viewpoint. Seals stated she wants Mark to be there every single <br />time, adding agenda items, and challenging the status quo. Seals stated they can also invite residents to <br />attend the meetings and speak, but that they need Mr. Kroll to help drive the agenda. Having a meeting <br />room full of people is effective and helps get the word out. <br />Printup asked if there could be co -representation on the LMCD in the event Mr. Kroll is unable to attend a <br />meeting. <br />Kroll indicated he will check into the legislative rules on that and that he will not be a passive member. <br />As far as succession planning goes, Kroll stated he thinks it is a great idea to have a successor in mind so <br />they know what they are getting into and do not get blindsided. <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT — REPRESENTATIVE BOB ERICKSON <br />11. LA19-000017 STEPHEN AND JENNIFER PAIDOSH, 4300 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION <br />Curtis stated this application is regarding a request to vacate the rights-of-way of Forest Boulevard and <br />Bluff Street situated between 4300 North Shore Drive and 1453 Park Drive. The rights-of-way were <br />originally dedicated with the plat Saga Hill Revised. There is an existing City stormwater catch basin and <br />pipe on the 4300 side of the right-of-way. The neighboring property owner to the east at 1453 Park Drive <br />has indicated their support of the vacation. Based on this, Staff considers both property owners to be <br />requesting the vacation. <br />At the May Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held, and following the public hearing <br />and discussion, the Planning Commission voted 6-1 against on a motion to deny the requested vacation. <br />The Planning Commission instead encouraged the applicant to apply for a variance to the average <br />lakeshore setback. <br />As noted in the report, Staff recommends denial of the request. If the Council supports vacation, Staff <br />recommends an easement for continued use and maintenance of the existing storm sewers. <br />At the request of a Council Member, Staff researched the request for a vacation. Since 2015, of the 24 <br />vacation applications made, three of those were vacation requests for lake access. One was denied on <br />Casco Point Road, one was tabled on Crystal Bay Road, and then this application tonight. If the Council <br />would like more information, Staff would need more time to compile the information. Staff would note <br />that in the past the City has vacated various rights-of-way around Forest Bay, including at least one lake <br />access. <br />The Council should make a decision regarding the vacation and then direct Staff to draft a resolution <br />reflecting this decision for adoption at the June 24 meeting. <br />Print -up asked what the other vacation was on Forest Bay. <br />Curtis stated she does not have a comprehensive list of the vacations, but it would be probably a better <br />analysis if Staff had more time. Curtis indicated on the overhead the location of the right-of-way and <br />noted this right-of-way vacation lake access was done in 1965. <br />Page 7 of 20 <br />