My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
06-24-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 10:28:13 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 10:23:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 10, 2019 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />support the variance and the use of the property has been achieved via the construction of the home and <br />the 1,152 square foot accessory structure. <br />The applicant has stated they need the addition to allow for trailer storage due to theft and vandalism. <br />The applicant states an addition to the existing building would be better financially, environmentally, and <br />neighborly. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their May meeting and discussed the proposed <br />variances. The Commissioners discussed the City Code for allowing one oversize accessory building and <br />also allowing up to 2,400 square feet total of accessory building square footage. Concerns were <br />addressed regarding overall massing coverage for the property. <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance request on a 4-3 vote with the <br />condition that any additional accessory structures on the property be prohibited. The City Attorney has <br />advised that any condition placed on a variance must have a clear connection to the regulation. <br />The applicant has submitted signatures from his neighbors in support of the project as well as his <br />homeowners' association. <br />Staff recommends denial. The City Council should review the submitted application and direct Staff to <br />draft a resolution. If a motion is made to approve the request, the Council should provide Staff with <br />applicable practical difficulties. <br />Crosby asked if there is an existing garage on the existing home. <br />Oakden indicated there is an attached garage and the detached garage was built two years ago. <br />Crosby asked what the practical difficulty is. <br />Johnson stated the practical difficulty is that the code does not make any sense, particularly in this <br />instance. The applicant can put another detached garage right next door to this one that is ten feet from it <br />but the Code says it cannot be attached. Johnson asked what the maximum is. <br />Oakden indicated this lot size, the applicant can have one building that does not exceed 1,200 square feet <br />and then he can have a total accessory structure massing of 2,400 square feet. The applicant could <br />technically have three more buildings as long as they do not exceed 2,400 square feet. <br />Johnson asked how big the existing detached garage is. <br />Oakden indicated it is 11,52 square feet. <br />Johnson stated this comes down to the topography, and that the applicant has received approval from his <br />HOA and supporting letters from the neighbors. If he was to add a detached garage on the side, it would <br />start getting into some topography issues. <br />Oakden stated there are some topography issues to the south as it moves back to the rear but the side <br />setbacks would be okay. <br />Page 15 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.