My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
06-10-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 10:23:33 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 9:56:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 20, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Paidosh noted building plans and setbacks are not required for land vacation and that they cannot create <br />structure drawings until after the vacation application. <br />Paidosh stated they would like to treat Bluff Street as an unimproved right-of-way, with the rationale that <br />50 percent goes to one side and 50 percent to the other. If a line is drawn from that point up to the <br />neighbor on the west, that would allow the house to shift down without pursuing a vacation, and what <br />Jeremy had proposed solved the setback problem. <br />Paidosh stated this is not an attempt at a land grab for either himself or his neighbor and that he would be <br />accepting additional tax liability without receiving much use of the land due to the proposed easement to <br />maintain the catch basin and storm water pipe. The easement would prevent him from building on the <br />vacated land. The house could probably be slid up slightly from the current setback and they are not <br />constructing a McMansion. Paidosh stated the only benefit he would get is the ability to build a new <br />structure beyond the current setback. <br />Until the first meeting with Jeremy, they were not aware of a land vacation and their intent in meeting <br />with Staff was to gain guidance and understand what a reasonable lakeside setback for the structure would <br />be and to help keep the costs down. Paidosh commented the process has been a bit frustrating due to the <br />lack of continuity within the Planning Department in supporting the vacation application. Paidosh <br />suggested this option not be discussed if there is no appetite for supporting it and that he is open to other <br />suggestions. <br />Erickson asked whether a new driveway would be created. <br />Paidosh indicated there would be and that they have had to go to all -wheel drive vehicles due to issues <br />with their current driveway. The other side has a more gradual slope and that they look at this as an <br />opportunity to relocate it. <br />Erickson stated any time someone can have their entrance on a lower traffic road, that has very positive <br />implications for traffic safety. <br />Paidosh stated his triplets will be driving soon and it is a safety factor. In fairness to Planning Staff, they <br />have been supportive of the driveway relocation. <br />Thiesse asked whether they could access from the other side if the garage is placed on that side of the <br />house. <br />Paidosh indicated it is pretty steep topography and would likely create other issues. <br />Erickson asked whether the applicant has given any thought to planting any native grasses along the <br />shoreline to help improve water quality. <br />Paidosh stated people have approached them on that in the past and that it might be something he would <br />consider in the future. <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.