My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
06-10-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 10:23:33 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 9:56:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LA19-000027 <br />May 20, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Septic System Status <br />Staff has completed a preliminary review of the project for compatibility with the septic system, <br />and has determined that the project is not likely to impact the existing or future septic sites. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties <br />attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Staff finds the submitted application does not meet the practical difficulties standards. The <br />applicant has indicated they can meet the City Code by building a separate accessory structure. <br />There are not any unique circumstances with the land or the use to support a variance to allow <br />an accessory building larger than the code would permit. The applicant has not demonstrated <br />that the property is unique to support the variance, and the use of the property has been achieved <br />via the construction of the home and the 1,152sq foot accessory structure. <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. The applicant submitted neighboring <br />signatures. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that the practical difficulties are met for this <br />request? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find there are unique circumstances with the <br />property, that don't also pertain to other properties? <br />3. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Does the Planning <br />Commission conclude any other findings where the applicant must receive this <br />variance and cannot meet the city code in any way? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends denial based on the submitted practical difficulties. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Application <br />Exhibit B. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. <br />Proposed Site Plan <br />Exhibit D. <br />Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Narrative <br />Exhibit F. <br />Neighboring property signatures <br />Exhibit G. <br />Property Owners List and Plat Map <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.