Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA19-000069 <br /> 16 Sept 2019 <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems <br /> appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure <br /> removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to <br /> prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development <br /> agreement between the property owner and the city, which agreement shall be <br /> recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions <br /> of approval will be documented as required. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties <br /> attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> The City adopted ordinances over the past few years to address inadequacies in the small, <br /> and/or narrow existing properties, and disproportionate distribution of lot area within the 75- <br /> foot setback for hardcover on Tier 1 lots. On Crystal Bay Road, Staff finds practical difficulties <br /> inherent to the size and shape of the lot, and location of the roadway and lake affecting the <br /> property which justify the variances allowing development and redevelopment. <br /> However,the applicant is proposing redevelopment on this property at a scale which is <br /> unsupported by practical difficulties, and is far beyond what is reasonable for the property and <br /> neighborhood to support. In particular,the proposed plan for 49.6% hardcover and 31.1% <br /> structural coverage far exceeds the reasonable flexibility allowed by variance from a staff <br /> perspective. In fact, staff finds the proposed structure and hardcover levels do not reflect <br /> sensitivity to the neighborhood character or community goals established by ordinance. <br /> Engineer Comments <br /> The City's Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and makes the following comments <br /> (reference L201 Grading and Drainage Plan). <br /> 1. Plans depict a retaining wall and some monuments immediately adjacent to the <br /> travel way(pavement)of the road. The wall, if needed, should be set back 10 feet <br /> from the edge of pavement. This setback is required for traffic safety,street <br /> maintenance operations, and to avoid impact on the water main located at the edge <br /> of pavement. <br /> 2. It appears the drainage design will utilize underground infiltration (French <br /> drains). Applicant should provide the calculations used to size the system. Also a <br /> detail of the French drain should be included in the plan set. <br /> 3. The drainage system appears to have drain tiles running though the root system of a <br /> large tree that is supposed to be saved near the road in the 75 foot setback. Also <br /> the proposed retaining wall appears to cut through that tree's root system. <br /> 4. Prior to building permit review, the site plan should be updated to show all existing <br /> utilities in accordance the city survey and site plan requirements. <br /> 5. The current haul route for the 1120 CYs of soil is shown using city streets within <br /> Minnetonka Beach. This should be coordinated with Minnetonka Beach. <br /> 6. Based on the amount of soil removal and proximity to the lake, a complete <br /> stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required as part of the building permit <br /> review. <br />