My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-2019 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
08-12-2019 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2019 3:51:45 PM
Creation date
8/27/2019 3:51:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,August 12,2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> neighboring lot to the north. That lot is flag shaped with the buildable portion set much further back. <br /> Due to this configuration, the subject lot is not buildable without an average lakeshore setback variance. <br /> The current home is nonconforming due to this extreme setback and hardcover. The applicants are <br /> proposing to build a new home with more massing forward of the average lakeshore setback compared to <br /> what is there today. The hardcover will decrease from the current level of 30.5 percent to 29.5 percent <br /> with the proposed plan but will remain over the 25 percent maximum. <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed and discussed the request. The Commission voted 5-1 to <br /> recommend approval of the requested variances. <br /> Staff recommends approval, subject to the City Engineer's comments, for the lot area, lot width, and <br /> hardcover variances. Staff recommends approval of the requested average lakeshore setback. <br /> Johnson requested the GIS be displayed. <br /> Oakden displayed an aerial of the area and pointed out the neighboring home and the lot that was <br /> subdivided. That subdivision resulted in a principal structure on the property and the extreme average <br /> lakeshore setback. <br /> Crosby asked how far ahead of the current home they will be going. <br /> Oakden stated to her knowledge it is around 30 feet. Oakden noted the orange is the footprint of the <br /> proposed home. There will be a screen porch that will be approximately 30 by 15 feet, which is forward <br /> of the existing patio. <br /> Walsh asked where the 75-foot setback is. <br /> Oakden stated it is pretty far forward. <br /> Walsh asked if the setbacks are five feet and eight feet. <br /> Oakden indicated the 5-foot is the window well and that there are 8-foot setbacks on the setback. They <br /> are required to meet a 7.8-foot setback. On the other side there is 12 feet. <br /> Walsh commented it is really the average lakeshore setback that is the issue, which will not change the <br /> view for the adjoining property, and that the hardcover is being reduced slightly. <br /> Crosby asked where the average lakeshore setback line is to the neighboring home. <br /> Oakden pointed out the approximate location of the line. The applicants have tried to align the proposed <br /> house with the other residences in the area. The red line on the survey is the closest point to the lake, <br /> which creates the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> Johnson noted they used two different points of reference, the property to the south, which is not the <br /> furthermost point, and the property to the north, which is the furthermost point to the lake. <br /> Walsh stated one is 136 feet and the other one is 142 feet. <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.