Laserfiche WebLink
4,0 CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �` " , �=� NO. 6660 <br /> t <br /> 4k SHol-fc <br /> A2. The Property is located within the RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential District which <br /> requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 200' for construction <br /> of a single family residence. <br /> A3. The Property is 0.62 acres in area, being 180 feet in defined width. The property is <br /> considered as legally nonconforming with regard to lot area and lot width. <br /> A4. The property is located within Storm Water Quality Overlay District Tier I which allows <br /> 25% hardcover. The proposed residence additions will result in total hardcover on the <br /> property of 4,212 s.f.or approximately 15.7%,well below the maximum overall hardcover <br /> allowance for the Property. Hardcover within the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is <br /> normally allowed is 1,070 s.f. <br /> A5. The applicants are proposing to reconfigure an existing deck into a covered deck with <br /> storage below, on the east side of the residence. The property abuts the creek that flows <br /> from Lake Classen to Stubbs Bay which is a protected tributary and subject to a 75' <br /> structure setback as well as the standard limitations on hardcover in the 0-75' zone. <br /> Portions of the existing house, deck and patio are within 75' of the creek shoreline,which <br /> normally exists at approximately the 960'contour,fluctuations being controlled by the dam <br /> further south just east of Leaf Street <br /> A6. The existing house is two levels with a flat roof,and the proposed deck area reconfiguration <br /> will retain that styling. The construction will be occurring almost entirely over existing <br /> patio,deck or driveway hardcover, and no hardcover incase is proposed.The additional <br /> superstructure of storage area enclosure and deck roof constitute new structure within 75' <br /> of the shoreline,requiring a variance for hardcover conversion and structure within 75' of <br /> the creek. <br /> A7. The proposal to replace the existing deck in its existing footprint, add a roof over it, and <br /> create enclosed storage under it, will not increase hardcover from the existing levels. <br /> Existing and proposed hardcover at just under 16%is well below the 25%Threshold for the <br /> site, and no additional hardcover is being added in the 0-75' zone, so runoff from the site <br /> is not expected to increase. <br /> A8. The only new structure footprint proposed is the 4' extension of the deck southward and <br /> the stairway leading to the driveway. This constitutes 46 s.f.of added structural hardcover <br /> in the 0-75' zone, while overall structural coverage on the lot will still be at only 5.5%, <br /> well below the 15%limit. <br /> A9. The proposed roof over the reconfigured deck will provide functionality while enhancing <br /> the architectural styling of the existing residence. Because the proposed deck roof is well <br /> below the 30'height limit,it is not expected to be visually intrusive from off-site. <br /> 2 <br />