My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#5128-prelim subd-2004
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
3240 Watertown Road - 32-118-23-44-0017
>
Resolutions
>
#5128-prelim subd-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:42:31 PM
Creation date
7/30/2019 11:28:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3240
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
3240 Watertown Road
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
3211823440017
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� . <br /> � O " • <br /> O O <br /> • �� � C ITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ti <br /> �'� G�' . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kES�I�g'� NO. � � � � <br /> 11. Substantial runoff from the adjoining properties to the east flows westward over <br /> the property. Incorporation of drainage swales is necessary along the driveway <br /> to accommodate this drainage. <br /> 12. Because the property includes a significant length of creek which flows to Lake <br /> Minnetonka, the incorporation of vegetative buffers for stormwater treatment is <br /> . appropriate. The applicant has proposed a 35' buffer adjacent to either side of <br /> the creek, which will be subject to a buffer easement. � <br /> 13. The topography of the site indicates a steep hill at the south end of Lot 1, and <br /> the proposed driveway will skirt the base of this hill. Neighbors have expressed <br /> a concern whether this area might be buildable. The slope is approximately 40% <br /> in some areas, and portions of it may meet the definition of a bluff, which <br /> . would be unbuildable area. The area southeast of the creek within Lot 1 with <br /> slopes of 18% or greater should be deemed as non-buildable. <br /> • <br /> 14. A park fee of$200 was paid for the existing Lot 1 when it was created in 1990 <br /> per the ordinance in place at that time, and no park fee was paid for Lot 2, on <br /> the basis that Lot 2 had previously had a house on it. Because the current <br /> application is primarily a lot line rearrangement between two existing lots of <br /> record, no park fees should be due with the current application. <br /> 15. Because the subdivision is primarily the rearrangement of two existing lots in <br /> order to make the northerly lot buildable, the argument can be made that only <br /> the newly buildable lot (Lot 1) should be subject to the Storm Water and <br /> Drainage Trunk Fee which is charged for land being developed. <br /> 16. Based on the above findings and appropriate conditions of approval, the <br /> proposed re-plat will result in two lots suitable for the construction of single <br /> family residences without the need for further variances. <br /> � <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.