Re: info on Lot 1 and outlot A - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

>s � � �i rt' :d !. f'.'� `iF.s,'�''E� i '7��,E, �Y�f"r •1 rrq��,�Fk'f$� ""'N�"+'�c7<�� y}: k-,�P I y xs 4A A MINUTES OF M&RCH 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING FILE #1506-SENN CONTINUED Hanson suggested that there may be opposition to the bridge by the fire insurance provider for this property. Mr. Don David, advised Hanson that the majority of the bridge will be constructed with steel and only the deck will be wood. Johnson questioned the need to involvt the Watershed District in this application due to the bridge. Mabusth said that the City Engineer will make that determination. She noted tnat unless a road requiring culverts is proposed to cross the creek, there is usually no need for a Watershed District review. Kelley asked for clarification regarding the legal combination of Outlot A and Lot 2. a Mabusth explained that Outlot A was created for the sole purpose of access and should be legally combined with Lot 2. It would then be required of the owner of Lot 2 to receive City approval to divide the combined lots at any future date. h Kelley noted that this proposal meets all of the Code Sections and is fairly straight forward. There were no comments from the public regare.ing this matter and the public hearing was closed. f It was moved by Planning Commissioner Brown, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision for Carol Senn, 3220 Watertown Road, w " subject to the conditions sec forth in staff's memo dated 3/12/90. Kelley asked how the City- 11 be assured that Lot 1 will be served by the future ,e corridor, rather than continuing to use Outlot A. Mab said that the Resolution will state that condition and that the future property owner will be alerted to that fact. Mabusth said there is nothing else that will force the owner of Lot 1 to use that other access. Kelley asked then why only temporary access via Outlot A was being granted at this time rather than permanent access? Mabusth asked the applicant if she had a preference. Ms. Senn replied that it «' made no difference to her. Mabusth suggested that though there is nothing that would automatically trigger the property owner to use the access once the zoad is constructed, the City can require =s 'ry that the access be used. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. OTHER: : , Mr. Gabriel Jabbour asked for the opportunity to briefly address the Planning Commission. 5 - f, a tit, f ,,�dd�� ➢^v�r� It�w 41a �� [ � A (..♦. 5" } }yam k }