My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#3743-denying variances-1996
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Walters Port Lane
>
2709 Walters Port Lane - 21-117-23-23-0060
>
Resolutions
>
#3743-denying variances-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:04:36 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 2:28:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2709
Street Name
Walters Port
Street Type
Lane
Address
2709 Walters Port Lane
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2111723230060
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . � � <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> b � CITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> ���, �G'�' , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �kESH�'�' NO. .e� `x � � <br /> C. The essential character of the neighborhood will be altered if the <br /> proposed variances are granted and the new additional structure in the 0- <br /> 75' zone is allowed to be constructed. <br /> D. The amount of light and air in the neighborhood would be diminished by <br /> converting the existing open deck to an enclosed structure on this <br /> , substandard lot. <br /> E. The conditions and zoning code limitations imposed and existing on this <br /> property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning <br /> district in which this property is located. <br /> F. Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants and the applicants have not demonstrated <br /> • sufficient reasonable hardship or practical difficulty to support the <br /> variance requests. <br /> G. The granting of this application is not necessary for the preservation and <br /> enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicants. Denial of a <br /> room addition for a therapeutic swim area in a location where such <br /> � structure would not normally be allowed, is not considered by Council <br /> to be a denial of substantial property rights. � <br /> 1l. In review of the facival findings noted above, the Council finds that granting of <br /> the proposed variances to allow construction of the proposed room addition <br /> would be in complete conflict with the environmental standards for lakeshore <br /> development within the City and would be detrimental to the public health, <br /> safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader environmental principals <br /> and goals set forth in its Community Management Plan and the intent of the <br /> specific zoning district standards when dealing with matters of public health, <br /> safety and welfare. Issues involving public health, safety and welfare are not <br /> only resolved by securing the obvious tr�c and drainage concerns, but the City <br /> is obligated to provide the citizens with a designated and optimum level of <br /> density, open space and quality of life. <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> • � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.