My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:03:45 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 3:03:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR APRIL 19, 1999 <br /> • 15. #2469/2470 STEVE AND JO WEBSTER, 500 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD, SKETCH PLAN/ <br /> VARIANCE—(cont.) <br /> Hawn inquired whether the Applicants would like the Planning Commission to go ahead and vote on <br /> this application or whether they would like it to be tabled to allow them additional time to revise their <br /> plans. <br /> Webster indicated he would like the Planning Commission to table the application and would consent <br /> to waiving the 60 day limit. <br /> Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2469/2470, Steve and Jo Webster, <br /> 500 Orono Orchard Road, to allow the Applicants time to submit revised plans and to extend <br /> the 60 day time limit. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> 16. #2476 CHRIS DIESEN, 1100 TOWNLINE ROAD,TWO LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN. <br /> Chris Diesen, Applicant, was present. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing a two lot subdivision for property located at <br /> 1100 Townline Road. The property consists of 13 plus acres in size, with 11 acres being dry <br /> buildable. The existing residence will remain on the property following the subdivision. The <br /> Applicant is proposing to split the property up to create two lots, both of which will exceed the five <br /> acre minimum for this district. <br /> Weinberger stated variances are required to lot width for both lots, and the existing septic system <br /> • on the property has been determined to be non-conforming. Septic testing needs to be completed <br /> on the south property with two suitable septic sites being identified. Septic testing has been <br /> completed on the northern lot with two sites having been identified. However, one of the site locations <br /> may be in conflict with the proposed driveway. <br /> Diesen stated he has had both sites tested and one site has been determined to be suitable on the <br /> southern lot. <br /> Weinberger indicated there would be a shared driveway for this subdivision and easements would <br /> need to be granted. <br /> Mr. Diesen commented there should not be a problem with the shared driveway as it will be family <br /> members residing on both lots. <br /> Weinberger stated that the wetlands still need to be delineated, but otherwise this appears to be <br /> an acceptable plan. <br /> Stoddard commented that the Applicant should try to avoid any variances to side yard setback. <br /> Diesen stated that some sites were tested but were slightly over the six percent grade. <br /> Hawn inquired what the difference is between a seven percent grade and a six percent grade as far <br /> as septic is concerned. <br /> Gaffron remarked that they are not substantially different, but the City elected to go with a six <br /> percent grade some years ago. Gaffron stated that the septic sites are likely to be approved by <br /> Steve Weckman. <br /> • <br /> Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.