My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
03-15-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:00:57 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 3:00:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR MARCH 15, 1999 <br /> • (#6) #2461 CHRIS PIERSON, ON BEHALF OF BRYSONS/JOHNSONS, 650, 660, 670, 680 <br /> BID ISLAND, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT, 8:03 p.m. -8:22 p.m.—(continued) <br /> The Applicants are proposing to combine Lots 3, 4 and one-half of Lot 5 to create one tax parcel <br /> on Big Island, and the center lot would be split and added to the 650 lot. <br /> Weinberger remarked the main issues to address would be the future of the existing cabin located <br /> on Lot 5. Fire Code does not allow a structure to exist this close to the property line. There are <br /> also exists some zoning code requirements which would require variances to be granted to allow <br /> a residence to be located this close to a lot line, and a conditional use permit would be necessary <br /> to allow a guest cabin. Currently City Code does not allow two principal residences to be located <br /> on one lot. <br /> The Applicants are proposing to keep the existing cabin, which Staff cannot support, and Staff <br /> has stated the cabin on Lot 5 shall be removed prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin <br /> County. The State Building Code does not allow buildings to be located within three feet of <br /> property boundaries. <br /> Weinberger stated this proposed lot line rearrangement would reduce density on Big Island and the <br /> eventual removal of structure and hardcover and returning the area more to its natural appearance. <br /> Currently the cabin located on Lots 5 and 6 shares a well located to the south, which would be <br /> moved to 650 property should the lot line rearrangement be approved, and also shares a septic <br /> system serving the property at 670. Staff is requesting that the septic lines be capped, and the <br /> proposal would be one septic site for one residence. Staff is also requesting that the <br /> easements and any other agreements relating to the well and septic systems be vacated and <br /> eliminated. At the time this was platted, there would not have been drainage and utility easements <br /> • <br /> to vacate over the old property line, but Staff is requesting that there be five feet on each side of <br /> the interior property line and ten feet across the rear of the property line for drainage and utility <br /> easements. <br /> Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement to create the two tax parcels with <br /> Lots 3, 4, and 5 making up one parcel, and Lots 6, 7, and 8 making up the other parcel. Staff is <br /> requesting that the cabin located on Lot 5 be removed, along with the deck, stairway, sidewalk, and <br /> removal of the shed, prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. Staff is also <br /> requesting that title opinions be delivered to the City for Lots 3 through 8. <br /> Pierson stated the property was acquired from Betty Fisher who had requested at the time of <br /> purchase that the cabin remain for a period of time due to sentimental reasons, which was agreed <br /> to by Bryson and Johnson. <br /> Chair Smith inquired what the use of the cabin will be should it remain on the property. <br /> Bryson indicated that they have no intentions on utilizing the cabin and are willing to remove it in two <br /> to three years. <br /> Johnson stated, if possible, they would like the cabin to remain for the next five years, but if the <br /> Planning Commission decided otherwise, they would be willing to remove the cabin. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Lindquist indicated he would be agreeable to allowing the cabin to remain on the property for two <br /> years. <br /> • <br /> Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.