My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
02-16-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:00:12 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 3:00:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16, 1999 <br /> • Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She stated the zoning district for this parcel is RR-1 B which <br /> requires two acres of dry buildable land for each residence. The lot area is 42.6 acres in total,with <br /> 20.5 dry acres and 23.1 wet acres. The site plan shows seven lots. The lots meet the two-acre <br /> minimum with the exception of lot 4. The dry acres are 1.8. A NURP pond will be located on lot 4. <br /> Access to lot 1 would be provided through King Street. The rest of the lots would be served by a cul- <br /> de-sac coming off from Brown Road. Lot 2 would be served by an outlot off from the cul-de-sac. Lot 2 <br /> would be considered a through-lot. She said the proposed plan shows a primary and secondary septic <br /> site for each proposed lot. The Park Dedication Fee has not been determined since this is a sketch <br /> plan. The City would require flowage and conservation easements over the wetlands and drainage <br /> and utility easements along the lot lines. The private road for the cul-de-sac would need to be <br /> designed and maintained according to City standards. She said the stormwater management issues <br /> have gone to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. She requested that the Planning Commission <br /> discuss the following issues: 1. Proposed access for Lot 1 via King Street; 2. Lot 2 access and status <br /> as through lot; 3. Lot 4 lot area at 1.8 acres; and 4. Tax-forfeited "exception" parcel. <br /> White asked if the tax forfeited parcel would increase the size of lot 4. <br /> Van Zomeren stated it would not increase the dry buildable area because the tax forfeited parcel is <br /> wet. <br /> Mabusth asked if a wetland delineation had been completed. <br /> Van Zomeren said yes. <br /> Steve Bohl stated his original proposal was for six lots with a cul-de-sac coming off from Willow Drive. <br /> III At that time, he did not have a contract to purchase the property located at 1045 Brown Road and the <br /> lots would have all exceeded the minimum 2.0 acre requirement. He said that Dave Zetterstrom of <br /> Hennepin County looked at the proposed access off from Brown Road. He said Zetterstrom felt that <br /> the access onto Brown Road would be a safe and better situation than adding additional traffic to <br /> Willow Drive. Zetterstrom also looked at the King Street access for lot 1 which <br /> currently serves one property, 775 Brown Road. He said Zetterstrom commented that this would be a <br /> safe entrance for both properties. Bohl talked about the ponding issue on lot 4. <br /> Mabusth asked if the NURP pond could be moved further north. <br /> Bohl said it could probably move to lot 3. He said the neighbor to the southeast corner of the property <br /> has asked about the possibility of Bohl selling a small portion of the property to the neighbor for an <br /> extension of their lot. If Bohl did not sell them that portion of the property and moved the lot lines, it <br /> would be possible to meet the two-acre minimum for lot 4. <br /> White asked about the topography of the site. <br /> Bohl said the perimeter of the southerly portion is pasture land. The exception piece on the west and <br /> the southeast portion are wooded. The northerly portion of the property is dense woods except for the <br /> wetland. <br /> White asked the purpose of the outlot attached to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Bohl said the outlot is the driveway access for lot 2. <br /> Van Zomeren said she wanted to point out the outlot and find out if that was acceptable rather than <br /> having lot 2 on the cul-de-sac. She said lot 2 is a through lot because it could have access on Willow. <br /> • <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.