Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16, 1999 <br /> ROLL: <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting <br /> Chair Elizabeth T. Hawn, Lili McMillan, Alternate Jeanne Mabusth and Alternate James White. The <br /> following represented the City Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Planner/Zoning <br /> Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder <br /> Lanette Wolf. <br /> Acting Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br /> (#1)#2458 CITY OF ORONO,ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, LR-1C-1, ONE FAMILY <br /> LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, SECTION 10.26, SUBD. 3. TO ELIMINATE THE <br /> ALLOWANCE OF A 50% INCREASE IN DWELLING UNIT DENSITY, FROM 2 TO 3 UNITS PER <br /> ACRE, 6:30 p.m. -6:55 p.m. <br /> Gaffron presented the staff report. He stated that the City Council adopted an interim moratorium in <br /> May 1998 temporarily suspending use of the 50% density credit in the LR-1 C-1 zoning subdistrict. <br /> This moratorium was established due to a development proposal that Council believed would add too <br /> much traffic to the local streets, and would add to the high volume of traffic that is already <br /> overburdening County Road 15. The properties zoned LR-1C-1 are located along County Road 15 in <br /> Navarre and adjacent to marinas on County Road 51 on Maxwell Bay. He said the existing <br /> neighborhoods surrounding these areas were developed prior to the City's adoption of the zoning <br /> regulations, and are generally developed much more intensely than would be allowed under the <br /> current zoning regulations. He said the Council is concerned that the current density credit language <br /> • does not provide sufficient discretion to the City to ensure a development is planned in such a way <br /> that it provides sufficient open space, landscaping and access options to somewhat balance the <br /> intensity of the surrounding development and minimize the traffic impacts. Gaffron displayed a map <br /> showing the location of properties that are zoned LR-1 C-1. <br /> Gaffron stated that the LR-1 C-1 density credit allows a 50% increase in dwelling unit density over the <br /> LR-1C District. The LR-1C District requires a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, which translates to a <br /> maximum dwelling unit density of 2 units per acre. A 50% increase in density yields 3 units per acre. <br /> Gaffron said the number of multi-family dwelling units that might be developed or redeveloped in the <br /> existing LR-1 C-1 zones under the current code is less than 20. He said the City has provided for <br /> significant numbers of multi-family dwelling units in its Highway 12 Corridor. Gaffron said an <br /> alternative to total elimination of the LR-1 C-1 district is to retain the ability to use a PRD (Planned <br /> Residential Development)to enable clustering and attached units. This would allow up to 4 attached <br /> units and would retain the ability to have a variety of housing types, but at a lower overall density than <br /> the current code allows. <br /> Gaffron stated that staff has drafted two options. Option 1 would delete language allowing 50% <br /> density credit, add language specifically allowing attached dwelling units as a Conditional Use, but <br /> only if Council determines the PRD provisions are met, and add a provision to limit density to two <br /> dwelling units per acre. Option 2 would delete Section 10.26 in its entirety and rezone all properties in <br /> LR-1 C-1 to LR-1C. <br /> Gaffron stated that the property owners within the LR-1 C-1 districts as well as property owners within <br /> 350 feet of those districts have been notified by mail of this public hearing. <br /> There were no public comments <br /> • <br /> Page 1 <br />