My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:59:39 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:59:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 1999 <br /> • (#2)#2449 JOHN VOGT/MIKE HILBELINK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD <br /> - Continued <br /> Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, a motion to approve#2449 for Mike Hilbelink and John <br /> Vogt, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road, Class Ill Preliminary Plat Subdivision,with <br /> the following conditions: <br /> 1. There will be an Outlot B that is 50'wide along the northern edge with a 100' cul-de- <br /> sac,with 80' of paved area. <br /> 2. Accessory structure total lot coverage will be determined and the historical <br /> significance will be determined. <br /> 3. A variance obtained for the location of the drainfield on Lot 3. <br /> 4. Park Dedication Fee will be determined. <br /> 5. Drainage issues be addressed as stated in the City Engineer's letter. <br /> 6. There will be private driveways for the two lots off the relocated cul-de-sac. <br /> 7. It is the applicant's responsibility to work with the Crystal Creek Homeowners' <br /> Association regarding the cost to use the private road as it exists. <br /> 8. Address the back lot acreage issue by rearranging the lot lines. <br /> 9. Move the temporary cul-de-sac to serve the two new lots and Lot 7. <br /> 10. City Engineer is to review the stormwater management plan. <br /> Schroeder asked if the two new lots will be back lots. <br /> Van Zomeren stated that they are not back lots if the road is extended with a cul-de-sac. If it is <br /> extended with a 50' outlot, they are back lots. A cul-de-sac has to be shown on the plat in order to not <br /> require the back lot acreage. The applicant will have to decide the location of the cul-de-sac. The City <br /> • <br /> would accept 50' straight across the top. As long as both new lots have access on the new cul-de-sac <br /> where staff can measure the lot width to the standard for the zoning district, they would not be <br /> considered back lots. <br /> Winston asked if the cul-de-sac would be constructed or platted. <br /> Lindquist stated it only has to be platted. <br /> Winston asked where the black top will end. <br /> Lindquist stated there will be a private road coming from the present cul-de-sac in Crystal Creek to the <br /> two additional lots. <br /> McMillan asked what would trigger the physical construction of the cul-de-sac. <br /> Van Zomeren stated that a cul-de-sac would have to be constructed when Lot 7 is developed. <br /> McMillan stated she would like to review the Crystal Creek resolution regarding the cul-de-sac. <br /> Stoddard stated the cul-de-sac should be platted now. <br /> Kahler stated that Lot 7 will be landlocked. <br /> Schroeder stated that perhaps all the lots could be served by the cul-de-sac and asked how many <br /> driveways can be served by a cul-de-sac. <br /> III Van Zomeren responded that as long as the lots can meet the lot width requirement, there is no <br /> restriction on the number of driveways from a cul-de-sac. <br /> Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.