My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:59:39 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:59:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 1999 <br /> III (#2) #2449 JOHN VOGT/MIKE HILBELINK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD <br /> - Continued <br /> Smith said she is concerned about the extension of Crystal Creek Road to serve two more lots. She <br /> can see the thought to provide a connection between Crystal Creek Road and Wear Lane. An <br /> alternative would be access directly off Watertown Road for all three lots. That alternative does not <br /> take future development into account and would land lock the lots to the north. <br /> Schroeder said the ability to connect Wear Lane and Crystal Creek Road should be retained. He <br /> believes that access to the lots in the north should be taken into consideration. He favors extending <br /> Outlot B to provide access to the north or to Wear Lane. <br /> Smith clarified that Schroeder favors extending Crystal Creek Road to serve the additional lots. <br /> Schroeder said he believes that is what was originally contemplated and the traffic from two more lots <br /> on Crystal Creek will not be dramatic. <br /> Lindquist agreed with Schroeder. He favors leaving the cul-de-sac where it is now located to serve the <br /> two new lots. He would also leave the outlot for future access to the north. <br /> McMillan said that the intent of planning in 1991 was to provide access to the property to the north. <br /> Schroeder said that it is not his intention to connect the two roads, but 30 years from now it could be <br /> possible. <br /> Smith said that possibility should not be negated. <br /> IIIMcMillan thinks two lots could be accessed from Watertown Road and one from Crystal Creek if the <br /> lot lines were redrawn and a driveway easement would be necessary. <br /> Stoddard said the City does not encourage easements. <br /> McMillan questioned whether one of the lots would be defined as a back lot. <br /> Van Zomeren said that whenever a lot is not served by a public or private road and it is served by an <br /> outlot, it is considered to be a back lot. <br /> Smith said she does not favor access on Watertown Road. <br /> Lindquist said he favors platting a cul-de-sac off from the outlot. <br /> Schroeder asked how Alan Carlson would access the lots to the north without this subdivision. <br /> Alan Carlson said he would have had to look at land to the east for access. <br /> Schroeder asked if an outlot could be put on lots 6 and 7. <br /> Van Zomeren said it could be put on lots 6 and 7. <br /> Smith said there seems to be consensus to extend the outlot and the applicants have said the <br /> accessory structures can be addressed. She asked about the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br /> letter and the issue regarding the stormwater permit. <br /> • Van Zomeren said she would like to hear from the applicants regarding this issue because it looks like <br /> the stormwater ponding would be in the Crystal Creek addition. <br /> Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.