My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:59:39 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:59:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 1999 <br /> (#4) #2443 GLEN UPTON, 3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE- Continued <br /> Smith said she cannot support anything over what the code will allow. <br /> Upton asked if he should just construct a platform. <br /> Smith said yes. <br /> Lindquist moved,Schroeder seconded, a motion to deny#2443 for Glenn Upton, 3685 North <br /> Shore Drive, based on the new deck being located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback and the <br /> hardship on the property was created by the applicant constructing the deck without obtaining <br /> permits.VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#2)#2449 JOHN VOGT/MIKE HILBELINK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD, <br /> PRELIMINARY PLAT, 7:01 p.m. -8:40 p.m. <br /> Van Zomeren stated this is an application for a three-lot preliminary plat. The site is approximately 12 <br /> acres in size with approximately 10.1 dry acres. Staff notified all the property owners in the Crystal <br /> Creek Homeowners Association that this item would be on the agenda. The applicants are proposing <br /> to subdivide the parcel into three lots and two outlots. Lot 3 would contain the existing residence and <br /> accessory structures. Access for Lot 3 would continue to be provided off of Watertown Road. The two <br /> new lots, Lot 1 and Lot 2, would be served by Outlot B which would be next to the private road in the <br /> Crystal Creek subdivision. If the two new lots are considered to be back lots, they would be required to <br /> have 3 acres of dry land. Lot 2 is 2.9 acres and Lot 1 is 3.3 acres. Along with this proposal, Outlot A is <br /> being created which could potentially be for sale to an adjacent property owner. Outlot A would be 1 <br /> • acre in size. Outlot B, which would provide access, is .21 acres. Wherever an outlot is platted rather <br /> than a private road, the lots that are served via the outlot are considered to be back lots. The back lot <br /> issue is a concern since one of the lots is proposed to be less than 3 acres. With back lots, there are <br /> increased setbacks for front, rear and side yards at 150% of the requirement for the district. It appears <br /> that the proposed home locations could probably meet that requirement. There are five accessory <br /> structures on Lot 3. If the structural lot coverage exceeds 3,200 square feet, either one of the <br /> buildings needs to be removed to meet the requirement or a variance will be needed. One of the <br /> buildings may have historical significance. Steve Weckman has evaluated the proposed septic <br /> locations. He notes that there are two stormwater ponds in the Crystal Creek subdivision and his <br /> concern was that the proposed septic site for Lot 3 is located only 58 feet from one of the ponds <br /> where 75 feet is required.A variance for the location of the drainfield will be required. She stated that <br /> the Park Dedication Fee needs to be determined. The Hennepin County Assessor has been asked to <br /> review the proposal and determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land. <br /> Van Zomeren stated that there are several engineering issues. The private driveway off of the private <br /> road is an issue because the City does not typically approve subdivisions that have streets that are <br /> longer than 1,000 feet or serving more than 10 units. This proposal would increase the length of the <br /> private road and the number of units served. The subdivision ordinance states that cul-de-sacs shall <br /> be discouraged. It was anticipated that Crystal Creek Road would eventually be connected to Wear <br /> Lane; however, Wear Lane is a public road and Crystal Creek Road is a private road. She pointed out <br /> that one of the adjacent properties is owned by Stubbs Bay Moving Co. Since there is a lot of <br /> equipment located on the property, the soils are probably compacted and there may not be a suitable <br /> septic site on that property. The future of that property for residential development is limited without <br /> sewer. <br /> Van Zomeren said that the City Engineer has noted that a street in Outlot B would drain to the storm <br /> sewer and pond in the Crystal Creek subdivision, that more ponding capacity could be required and <br /> • that the Watershed District would need to comment. There are also grading and drainage issues. <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.