Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16, 1998 <br /> (#2395 Brent Bentrott, continued) <br /> the curb cut to Bluff Street to provide a less steep landing area. <br /> Van Zomeren remarked that Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, has reviewed this property and has <br /> concerns regarding the negative impact the grading would have on the adjoining property as well <br /> as the need to relocate the curb cut on Bluff Street if that street is ever opened for public purpose. <br /> Van Zomeren stated the Planning Commission had recommended in July that Bluff Street not be <br /> vacated. The proposed driveway cannot be contained on the Applicant's property because of the <br /> existing topography and the need to provide a grade of ten percent or less for the driveway. <br /> Chair Smith stated to her recollection the reason the last plan submitted in October was not looked <br /> favorably upon was due to concerns regarding grading and drainage, and this newly revised plan <br /> seems to be similar to a previous plan that was submitted where the Applicant was advised that <br /> the Planning Commission would not look favorably upon a vacation to Bluff Street. <br /> Bentrott remarked this is a new plan that has not been submitted before. <br /> Chair Smith commented this plan appears to have a different degree of impact on Bluff, but it was the <br /> consensus of the Planning Commission a couple of months ago that they would not look favorably <br /> upon any plan that would impact Bluff Street. <br /> Van Zomeren stated that it was her understanding that Bluff Street currently contains a grade of <br /> 23 percent. <br /> • Bentrott stated he received Kellogg's letter on Thursday, noting that the proposed curb cut is <br /> 19 feet and not the 20 feet as stated in Kellogg's letter. Bentrott remarked the curb cut could be <br /> further reduced if necessary. <br /> Stoddard inquired whether the driveway could be completely located on the Applicant's property. <br /> Van Zomeren stated the driveway cannot be located entirely on the Applicant's property due to the <br /> topography that exists and the need to have a flat area to make the proper grade. Van Zomeren <br /> commented that the grade of the driveway was not known at the last meeting. <br /> Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Chair Smith stated there has been some comments received from the adjoining neighbors Mark and <br /> Pam Palm. <br /> Van Zomeren remarked that City Staff has received some inquiries from the Palms regarding what <br /> is being proposed. The Palms are proposing to do some underpinning around the foundation of their <br /> house. The City Engineer has stated that grading cannot accurately occur up to the property line, <br /> and that some grading may occur on the neighbor's property. <br /> Chair Smith stated according to some comments contained in Van Zomeren's memorandum, the <br /> Palms have concerns about the drainage impact on their property. Smith inquired what the Palms <br /> exact concerns were regarding. <br /> • Van Zomeren stated the Palms have reviewed the proposed plan and called City Staff saying they <br /> Page 2 <br />