My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
10-19-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:58:05 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:58:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MONDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1998 <br /> (#2429 Jeffrey Brauchle, continued) <br /> damaged. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2429, 650 North Arm Drive, <br /> as outlined in the October 12, 1998 Planner's Report, subject to the removal of the plastic <br /> underlayment. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#17) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION,4755/4775 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br /> EASEMENT/SUBDIVISION, 11:01 p.m. -11:12 p.m. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Laurie Lundeen, Greenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg were present. <br /> Van Zomeren stated the Applicants have sold Lot 1 and have granted a 20 foot private driveway <br /> easement over Lot 3 to provide access. The private driveway easement is not in compliance <br /> with the resolution that required access to Lot 1 be via Outlot A. <br /> Van Zomeren commented that driveway easements tend to cause confusion as to ownership and <br /> rights as well as issues surrounding location of garbage cans, mailboxes, landscaping, mowing, and <br /> maintenance, and Staff would prefer that driveway easements not be utilized if at all possible. <br /> In order for this easement to be recognized by the City, the City Council would need to retract that <br /> portion of the resolution dealing with the location of the driveway. <br /> • De Berg stated the outlot is currently being used for access. <br /> Lundeen stated there was a private driveway easement granted. <br /> Van Zomeren remarked there was a resolution signed by the City Council which specified how <br /> access to these lots was to be provided, and this private easement represents a change to that <br /> resolution. <br /> DeBerg commented the outlot still provides the access. <br /> Hawn stated the parties need to follow the conditions outlined in the resolution. <br /> Van Zomeren stated before access was determined, there should have been a review done of the <br /> available building pads. <br /> Lindquist inquired whether they could do a lot line rearrangement. <br /> Chair Smith inquired whether the Applicants wanted the Planning Commission to act on this matter <br /> tonight. <br /> DeBerg requested the Planning Commission act on the application. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> S Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to deny Application #2432, 4755/4775 Bayside Road, <br /> based upon Resolution No. 3750. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.