Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 21, 1998 <br /> 4110 (#12 City of Orono, Zoning Ordinance, continued) <br /> McMillan suggested adding a toilet/shower/bathtub or any combination of those should require <br /> a conditional use permit. <br /> Stoddard inquired whether the code allows garage floor drains. <br /> Gaffron stated the code does permit floor drains provided they don't flow to a septic system or to <br /> city sewer. <br /> Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to amend Section 10.03 and 10.20, Re: Plumbing in <br /> Accessory Structures, per the revised language contained in Exhibit A, subject to <br /> approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission and City Council for the <br /> installation of a toilet/shower/bathtub or any combination thereof, and further subject to <br /> the inclusion of language by the City Attorney regarding the requested changes by the <br /> Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> (#11) #2389 DANIEL KLUTH, 2801 FOX STREET -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND <br /> VARIANCES, CONTINUED, 9:28 p.m. -9:42 p.m. <br /> Daniel Kluth was present. <br /> Kluth stated he has spoken with the neighbors concerning the proposed accessory structure, <br /> noting everyone was in agreement with the structure. <br /> • There were no public comments. <br /> Kluth stated he is requesting a toilet and sink and would like the Planning Commission to act on <br /> his application. Kluth commented he would be willing to comply with whatever restrictions the <br /> ordinance calls for as well as whatever conditions the City Council may impose. <br /> Stoddard inquired whether a street yard setback variance was still needed. <br /> Gaffron stated this application only needs a conditional use permit for the plumbing fixtures. <br /> McMillan moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2389, 2801 Fox Street, <br /> subject to approval of Sections 10.03 and 10.20 by the City Council. NO VOTE TAKEN. <br /> Schroeder noted the Planning Commission was making a motion on an ordinance that currently <br /> is not enforce by the City. <br /> McMillan stated the motion is contingent upon approval of the ordinance change by the City <br /> Council. <br /> Chair Smith stated if the ordinance is not passed by the City Council, Kluth's application may not <br /> be acted upon. <br /> Van Zomeren inquired whether the Planning Commission would like to recommend the application <br /> be processed as a conditional use permit for plumbing in an accessory structure. <br /> Schroeder suggested the application be kept as currently proposed unless the City Council denies it. <br /> • <br /> Page 13 <br />