Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JUNE 15, 1998 <br /> • (#9 #2379 Deborah M. Sholl — Continued) <br /> A front yard setback variance was granted in 1997. This property is subject to RR-1A lot <br /> requirements. Staff recommends approval. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Shroeder requested the minutes reflect the Planning Commission voted in the absence of the <br /> Applicant. <br /> McMillan moved,Berg seconded,to approve Application #2379, granting a front setback <br /> variance for the property located at 4100 Watertown Road to allow construction of a three <br /> season porch per Staff's recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> (#10) 2380 BRUCE SCHMIDTT ON BEHALF OF RICHARD AND KATHY KYLE, <br /> 1140 TONKAWA ROAD- VARIANCE, 9:59 p.m. - 10:17 p.m. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Bruce Schmidtt, architect, represented the Applicants. <br /> Van Zomeren stated the Applicants are requesting variances from average lakeshore setback <br /> requirements and the 75 foot setback requirement for lakeshore property to add a second story <br /> to their home. This property is located within the LR-I B zoning district and consists of.62 acres. <br /> Staff recommends approval of this application, noting no change to hardcover is being requested. <br /> • Stoddard stated the proposal looks good, and inquired whether the shed located on the property <br /> could be relocated and the current hardcover be reduced by minimizing some decks. <br /> Bruce Schmidtt stated he has talked to the property owners about hardcover, noting that the lower <br /> deck could probably be minimized, but cited a need for the steps down to the lakeshore. <br /> Hawn felt there was a lot of hardcover in the 0-75'zone which could possibly be reduced. She <br /> noted the decks look relatively new, yet the records indicate there were no permits issued. <br /> McMillan remarked the shed was too close to the property line. and suggested the deck off the <br /> house be reduced with the other deck being kept as is because it may be difficult to reduce since <br /> the deck is part of the stair structure. <br /> Stoddard commented he was in favor of the application subject to the removal of the shed and <br /> reduction to both decks. <br /> There was no public comment. <br /> Berg suggested both decks be reduced with the shed being moved. <br /> Bruce Schmidtt suggested that perhaps the patio could be eliminated to reduce hardcover. <br /> Van Zomeren stated the shed as presently situated is located two feet off the property line. <br /> • <br /> 10 <br />