Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16, 1998 <br /> #2 - # <br /> ( #2340 Robert Waade Continued) <br /> Mabusth asked if the applicant would meet the area requirement if given credit for the <br /> ponding. Gaffron indicated there would only be a very minor underage. <br /> Mabusth asked if the duplex would be served by Outlot B. Gaffron indicated it would and <br /> noted that the standard calls for no more than two units being accessed off the 30' <br /> corridor. The reason behind the standard is to limit the units as three units would require <br /> a road. There may be a hardcover issue if the access was changed. <br /> Stoddard felt the variances for the widths of Outlots A and B made sense as it would <br /> allow for smaller roadway and lessen the hardcover. He noted that the property is allowed <br /> a duplex under the code and felt the road issue was not substantial enough to show any <br /> opposition. <br /> Mabusth asked what the absent Commissioners felt about the issues. Smith indicated that <br /> Lindquist was concerned with the number of variances and did not want to encourage <br /> their need. <br /> Gaffron said the duplex requires a 135'minimum width. The lot width as defined by CoRd <br /> 51 does not meet the requirement. It is only met if the width is defined along the private <br /> S road outlot. The upper lot has about 121'width and the lower lot has 122'. If the <br /> "exception" segment in the front of the lot is considered there would be about 140'. <br /> Mabusth noted there would be a hardcover problem if additional driveway was necessary <br /> for three dwellings on one driveway outlot. The driveway would be minimized with two <br /> dwellings on one access. <br /> Berg asked if the proposed units would be rental units. Waade said he would live in the <br /> single family home and rent out the duplex. Gaff-on indicated the duplex would have to <br /> be rental units as the ownership of the duplex cannot be split into individual units under <br /> the City ordinances. <br /> Smith noted that all of the Commissioners at the last meeting were opposed to providing <br /> riparian rights for the duplex. <br /> Mabusth asked if the sewer locations have been reviewed. The issue of easements needs <br /> to be resolved as well. Mabusth noted the need for a hold harmless agreement for the <br /> City. Gaffron said the manholes would have to be raised as well. Waade said the bermed <br /> area would be built up about 5', and he would like to plant a row of pine trees for <br /> screening. Commissioners voiced their support. Smith asked what type of landscaping <br /> would be planted. Waade said he would like to add about 8-10 arborvitae trees on top of <br /> the berm to make a hedge. <br /> • <br /> 4 <br />