My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:50:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16, 1998 <br /> (#10)#2348 Mary Jane Hauser- Continued) <br /> Smith and Berg both felt the code should be applied to the application and the 25% <br /> hardcover be met. Malkerson reiterated that the driveway would need to cut through the <br /> treed area to meet this requirement. Malkerson did not believe the lot should be <br /> considered a "clean" lot, such as is found in a cornfield. Berg said the requirement applies <br /> to all lots. Malkerson suggested the grading and filling be considered as well. Berg noted <br /> that the issue is whether the lot can be built upon within the parameters given. Malkerson <br /> disagreed that the test of the lot was as indicated by Berg. <br /> Stoddard noted he did not believe there was a hardship based on the lot. Stoddard said he <br /> may consider a plan with a small variance but the Commission historically does not send to <br /> Council applications that are not substantiated with a proposed plan. Stoddard said he <br /> could not support the plan as submitted. <br /> Hauser asked to table the application for further review. Smith explained the procedure <br /> that is following. <br /> Bressler asked for direction for the applicant regarding the amount of hardcover. Hauser <br /> asked if the Commission would approve hardcover at 25.9%. Bressler noted that tabling <br /> the application would require an extension from the 60-day review period. <br /> • <br /> G p <br /> affron was asked for his opinion. Gaffron indicated that he would not be able to <br /> stipulate a percentage. He indicated in most cases the hardcover allowed sets the limit. <br /> Circumstances may present some alteration but is difficult with no hardship shown for a <br /> bare lot. Gaffron said Council may look at the existing amenities. <br /> Bressler noted that 320 s.f would equal 1%of hardcover. <br /> Berg asked if the applicant would consider eliminating the loop while still maintaining the <br /> entrance and driveway. Hauser said he would consider that noting the hardcover would <br /> still be exceeded by about 500 s.f Discussion was held regarding placement of the garage <br /> but Hauser said the locations were such to take advantage of the existing grades. Hauser <br /> said the driveway could come straight in as an option as previously noted. Berg informed <br /> Hauser that the Commission's intent is to create a good situation for both the city and <br /> applicant. <br /> Smith questioned whether there was adequate support of the 25.9%hardcover requested. <br /> This would result in elimination of the loop without moving the driveway. <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.