Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16, 1998 <br /> • (#10)#2348 Mary Jane Hauser- Continued) <br /> Hauser said his intent is to utilize the lot in the best manner. Hauser said the neighboring <br /> homes exceed the allowable hardcover. Hauser felt he was not asking for anything special <br /> noting he could meet the hardcover allowance by placing the driveway in the treed area <br /> but reiterated the problems it would cause in that location. <br /> Hauser said the design has gone through much review. His time line is problematic, and <br /> he would like the Commission to make their recommendation at the meeting in order for <br /> him to move forward with his financing. <br /> Mabusth indicated that hardcover was the only issue and noted that the house was ideally <br /> located on the lot. <br /> Hauser asked the Commission to consider the additional burdens existing on the property. <br /> Berg suggested that an option was to eliminate the circular driveway. <br /> Mabusth asked if consideration has been given to removing a portion of the loop. Bressler <br /> said eliminating the loop driveway would reduce the hardcover within 1%of meeting the <br /> 25%allowed but had been informed by the applicant that this was not an option he would <br /> 4111 consider. Bressler said staff then looked at the footprint for possible reductions in <br /> hardcover. The plan for a straight driveway through the treed area would result in <br /> hardcover of 27%. A driveway alternate was noted on eases 10 and 11 of booklet <br /> presented by Malkerson, which eliminates the loop of the driveway reducing the driveway <br /> by 1000 s.£ at a 12'width. Hauser indicated this would place the driveway into the higher <br /> elevations. It would result in difficulty in backing out and require retaining walls and 2000 <br /> cubic yards of fill. <br /> Smith inquired about the proposed separate structure on the property. The structure is a <br /> proposed 2-car garage in addition to the 3-car attached garage. The original plan was for <br /> a 4-car attached garage but was eliminated due to hardcover. <br /> In noting the applicant's strong feelings regarding each element of the application and not <br /> wanting to redesign the plan any further, Stoddard asked what could be done to reduce <br /> the hardcover. Hauser said he has tried to do so and considers the straight driveway as a <br /> last resort. He feels the property conditions with the grades and fill constitute hardship to <br /> allow the hardcover variance for use of the existing driveway. <br /> Bressler proposed a change to the garage structure location and size to meet the <br /> hardcover. The separate structure would be increased in size and the attached garage <br /> reduced in size. It was noted that this increase would result in the structure becoming an <br /> oversized accessory structure. <br /> • <br /> 22 <br />