My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:49:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br /> -(#5 - #2339 James Render Continued) <br /> Gaffi on confirmed for Lindquist that the other two options were a cul-de-sac or just a <br /> road. Lindquist felt the 50' road should be dedicated and remain private until such time <br /> that the road is extended. Lindquist noted the need to determine whether a T or cul-de- <br /> sac should be built. <br /> Render informed McMillan that he would ask for an additional 17'to credit hardcover in <br /> return for providing the dedicated roadway. Gaffron informed McMillan that the typical <br /> setbacks would be required. <br /> Gaffron said the private road outlot would be dedicated the entire length. The City would <br /> take an underlying easement. The Commissioners were in agreement with Gaffron's <br /> recommendation for a 28' wide roadway. <br /> The question remained of when the road should be extended and whether a T or cul-de- <br /> sac. Lindquist said he preferred the cul-de-sac but understood the concerns of the <br /> applicant if one was built. Smith suggested a shared driveway be allowed for two lots. <br /> She recommended two driveways instead of the cul-de-sac. <br /> Render clarified that the 28' wide private road would extend only to where the turnaround <br /> would be located. Commissioners agreed. <br /> Berg agreed with Smith in preferring no cul-de-sac. Gaffron asked if the shared driveway <br /> would be between lots 2 and 3. Render said the shared driveway would be located <br /> between lots 1 and 2 for future access. <br /> Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application#2339 with the <br /> understanding that the 50' right-of-way would extend the complete length of the property <br /> through the granting of 42' from the property owner in addition to the current 8' of <br /> easement. The road would be a 28' shared private road with a paved T turnaround. The <br /> applicant would be allowed a credit of a 17' strip of land for hardcover allotment. <br /> Gronberg asked if the road could be platted as a 25' outlot with an additional 17' <br /> easement. Lindquist said it would have to be 50' platted through 42' from property owner <br /> and 8'from other properties. <br /> Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#6) #2340 ROBERT WAADE, 3280 AND 3290 NORTH SHORE DRIVE- <br /> PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- 8:15-8:39 <br /> P.M. <br /> • The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.